Floyd would have always beaten Pacquiao.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by VG_Addict, Mar 12, 2021.


  1. JDub

    JDub Active Member Full Member

    1,477
    1,654
    Dec 8, 2018
    2009 it would of been a big risk for Floyd and he knew it. Pac looked incredible at that point.
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2021
    Reinhardt, jmarlow and Aussie Invader like this.
  2. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    I think we all knew this. Peak Mayweather edges out peak Pacquiao via UD.
    Pac will surely have his moments, as he did, but stylistically, you'd always bet on FMJ.
    The only person who didn't believe it, even during their fight that he's supposedly winning, was "why are you fighting scared" Floyd himself.
     
  3. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,031
    19,122
    Oct 4, 2016

    Would Floyd have always beaten Manny? Floyd didn't think so did he .
     
  4. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,031
    19,122
    Oct 4, 2016

    He was at the top of his pharmaceutical training
     
  5. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,885
    29,417
    Feb 25, 2015
    Floyd is probably better H2H than Pac.

    But then again andrzej fonfara KO Mayweather.

    So take the H2H thing for what its worth.

    The fact that Pac is even compared to Mayweather demonstrates hes the better p4p fighter.

    Max Kellerman has long pointed this out.
     
  6. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    36,885
    29,417
    Feb 25, 2015
    What's the debate? Who is the better fighter? I think its Mayweather.

    In my lifetime (was born in 92) Lennox Lewis is the best fighter. Mayweather doesnt crack the top 1000.

    If we are talking p4p well then it is Mayweather who is NOT in Pacquiaos league.