Floyd's 3 decades of "Dominance"!!!

****ing ******. That is not what you stated in your post. Read your post!!

"English Mother****er" "Do You Speak It?"

 

Fighting once and happens to be Mosley in 2010 your meaning of dominance? It's not even being dominant on that ****in' year, let alone a decade.

Again, either you don't understand your own post or you're just plain dumb.

 

Crack baby.

 

We know what you meant. WHat you are being clowned on is youre blatatnly misleading title, then your holier then thou attitude when being called out on it. You made a fail of a thread, just accept it. Has nothing to do with Pac, and is all on your stupidity. atsch

 

ehy then the title of this thread should be

"hussleman's 3 decades of DUMBminance" :yep:yep:yep

 

30 years,,,WHAT? stupid,idiot and brainless *****:rofl:rofl:rofl are u crazy? 3 decades is 3o years moron.:deal

 

Change the title to 2 centuries of dominance. It's as equally correct (i.e. not).

 

He also dominated the 1000's and the 2000's!!! :shock:

 

I actually like husslemans posts but he's way off on this. Infact Floyds biggest thing that hurts him is the lack of great fighters on his resume since he moved up from lightweight. Pacquaio is destroying him on resume alone thus far.

 

According to him you might as well make that 2 millennium. the 1000s and now 2000s :rofl:rofl:rofl:roflnut

 

You can say He dominated in 3 different decade, but not in 3 decades.atsch

1996-2010= 14 yrs.

3 decades= 30 yrs.

big difference

 

****ing ****** that is called fighting in three different decade and not dominating for three decades. Do you ****ing see it now? What you posted does not equal to your dumb ass back peddling reply. Look at your post ******. What does this mean, "Floyd's 3 decades of dominance", in English?

 

hussleman, are you related or an alt to Michigan warrior?

 

I think this is about MATH.