Sadly it is not. He is so stupid that he thinks if you fought in any decade it means you have dominated for the decade and not just appeared in the decade.
It means as we speak in three different decades he has been ranked in the top 5 in p4p rankings and still undefeated. Example: Muhammad Ali 1960's (1964) Ali vs Liston 1 , biggest upset of the decade 1970's (1974) Ali vs Foreman, biggest upset of the decade 1980's (1980's) Ali vs Holmes, If Ali had won it would have been biggest upset of the decade according to boxing experts. All 3 fights were in the Top 5 as highest grossing fights of the decade (In 1980 when the fight was fought it was the highest grossing fight of the decade. 1990's - Floyd fighter of the year and Olympic Medalist P4P number # 2, and received votes for Fighter of the decade. 2000's- Floyd P4P number #2 at the end of decade and runner up fighter of the decade ( He should have won) 2010"s- #2 P4P, and Mayweather vs Mosley highest grossing fight of the decade as we speak. This third decade counts, like being behind one dollar on rent! Having Logic, is priceless!
.... Floyd fans get a little over excited when they are in their praise mode. Floyd has a very good career. I just feel it falls way short of what his actual potential is. His ego and defensive nature in protecting his undefeated record has hindered his legacy.
Keep posting. You are becoming a legend for your stupidity!! See that word in your post that I put in bold. That does not equal to what you posted. Your thread stated that Floyd dominated for three decades. Let me break down that headline you used for your thread. "Floyd's" Floyd apostrophe s means he is ownership of the 3 decades of dominance. The other part of the sentence "3 decades of dominance" means 30 years of dominance. I'll say it again since you are slow. 3 decade of dominance is short for 30 years of dominance. This is what your thread says. Is this simple enough for you?