This is the third decade Floyd has been dominating so far. Still 3 decades of dominance. *******s are ******s.
Floyd could have easily have done this also, all he needed was to pay the sanctioning fee for mosley's wba belt, but he didn't want to. So he could have done this also. Just saying.:good
Floyd has dominated for the past 100 years. 3 decades is 30 years. Round that up to the nearest 50 and that's 50 years. Rounded up to the nearest hundred and that's 100 years. A MU****IN CENTURY OF DOMINANCE
how did i miss this thread? i dont blame hussleman, that ***** should have sent him to school instead out sucking **** for crack at 6.
Hussleman, like others I'm a bit confused by your logic. In the 90's you have based his achievements on a few years of activity there. Given he only had a few significant fights and appeared in p4p lists for 2 years in the 90's, saying he dominated that is a massive call. Dominance Imo would mean p4p top three for more than half the decade, preferably most. Floyd "dominated" for less than 2 years in the 90's and even that's a stretch. The 0's he did very well, though I wouldn't say he "dominated" it can definitely be argued he was one of the best p4p'ers throughout, and would arguably be top 3 over that ten year period. Now, given you are judging his standings Based on where he was sitting at the end of each decade, by your logic don't we need to wait until dec 2019 before evaluating his performance of this decade? If not, let's relook at the 90's, what was he doing in 91 or even 95 for that matter? After all, the first year of a decade is all we need to base a whole decades performance on
AH, the Legend of Floyd grows and grows exponentially the longer he is inactive. By 2014 he'll have beaten heavyweights in someones fantasy land but still not fought Pacquaio, thus saving his beloved "0".