Floyd's ATG Status by Weight Class!

I have no idea where to start

 

Yeah, I don't get this guy at all. When he is met with the facts, he ignores that post, yet brags about winning debates. How can you win a debate if you ignore the facts? It's like saying "Herb Siler was a better boxer than Muhammad Ali". Followed by "Ali beat Siler and went on to beat some of the greatest heavyweights ever". Then he'll throw a few insults around after saying he'd won the debate.

I'd love him to justify placing Sanchez where he is. I'm sure he'll conveniantly skip this post too, though.

 

Comparing new to old is utterly ******ed. Sweet pea you pointed out that technique was way different so why even compare? Its stupid.


Thats why all time list IMO are stupid.


Rocky Marciano went undefeated but he would be killed by Wladimir Klitschko.

 

Yea but still. Head to head a lot of the BEST fighters of today beat the past IMO. They are faster, bigger and strong for their weight classes. Sub in the fact that today people go up in weight after weighins as compared to doing in the past.

 

Why is Sanchez ranked at 130? Am I missing something?

 

Why is Floyd above Joe Gans and Benny Leonard at 135? And why is he above Carlos Ortiz, Ike Williams, Tony Canzoneri, etc?

 

I cannot compare and wont even try since I dont know a whole lot about past greats they do not interest me. =/

 

Yea I just dont think you can compare the past fighters unless you lived in that time.

 

How many fights do you need to see, to be able to judge them properly? I've seen Ortiz probably about 10 times or something, and I think that let's me analyse him enough. I think you need about 5 fights do see how the fighters style changes against other boxers.