to maintain any credit it has to be legacy enhancing victory. like bradley at 140 or cotto at 154. to maintain any credibility it really has to be a minimum of andre berto. anything below that and people will deride it as a joke.
You're just saying that so under the circumstance he takes on anybody other than those 3 specific fighters you named, you can ridicule it and you will have this quote bookmarked so you can say, "hey, I said it would be a joke a few months ago." Joshua Clottey Antonio Margarito Shane Mosley Consecutively. All of those guys when Pacquiao fought them were beneath where Berto is now. Their combined past two fights: 2-3-1. Got to love it.
Well it obviously won't be anyone high risk if he's going to fight Pacman, but like always, whoever it is he does end up fighting, he'll bring them up as a terror in the ring and overhype his opponent to make it seem competitive. I'll give him props if he takes on a high risk low reward fight like Berto or Bradley, but they don't call him Money for nothin. Even he said he doesn't care about legacy, only makin the benjamins, which doesn't make sense, because by making a great legacy, you'll be making the most money possible.
are you a freak or something? i didn't say specific, i said berto is the minimum standard. as in a current welterweight belt holder. i don't think he should fight margo, clottey nor mosley. they would be joke fights. clottey isn't even a welterweight anymore and margo/mosley haven't won in two years. i don't get what there is to love about that. you want my full list of credible fights? pac(obviously) 154: martinez williams cintron bundrage cotto dzinzuruk winner of alvarev/hatton 147: berto zavek senchenko 140: bradley khan judah why would i bookmark a thread? why would i ant floyd to take a joke fight? the idea of having an ATG fighting during my time is great so i want the best fights to be made. i can't believe you rate clottey/margo/mosley so highly. i don't understand what there is to love about 3 guys all coming off losses to pac (pac will beat shane, it's a mismatch) are you just a troll, is that it?
I thought he is going to announce soon? The idiotic *****s were actually singing with joy when there was this thread stating that Gayweather will make an announcement soon. It looks like the announcement was for announcing that Gayweather will make an announcement on when he is going to announce his next opponent. jsut like when they announced he is going to get married - which is a facade actually for his gayness.