The more you look into his early fights, the guy was a hobo fighting whoever he could to make ends meet. this fight wasn't a one off, I just ahven't been able to prove it yet :-(
So, what have you found by looking into his early fights that suggests he was sparked out under different names ? (Everyone knows he was a hobo. )
Seamus has reviewed multiple sources on this bout and concluded the evidence to reverse what the record states is flimsy and anecdotal. Seamus takes the record, backed with newspaper accounts, innocent until proven guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt.