Food For Thought: What Defines An Opponent As Being Great/Worthy?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by walk with me, Oct 1, 2013.


  1. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    This is an interesting topic to think about. In the sport of boxing a lot of the time we as fans complain about mis-matches when it comes to great fighters. It's easy to look at an opponents resume and say he isn't **** or isn't worthy of a fight. Or to call it a simple mismatch but to be fair we typically don't look at this topic objectively and fairly.


    Joe Frazier before the first Ali Fight was just a challneger. He had no historically important fighters on his resume prior to Ali. His biggest win was vs buster mathis and buster mathis resume is filled with KO vs mediocre comp.


    Antonio Tarver before the first Roy Jones fight was just a challenger. He didn't ahve any major wins to hang his hat on either. He had an extremely low amount of fights for getting such a high profile victory over a sure shot HOF'er such as Roy Jones.


    Buster Douglas lost 4 times (3 by T/KO) before his tyson fight and he happened to pull a rabbit out of his hat vs tyson.



    My point is I don't think we should continue to criticize fighters for taking on what is supposedly "cab drivers" or "set up fights" when really legends are made in the course of one fight when the perfect storm happens.



    just some food for thought
     
  2. PR BOXING

    PR BOXING Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,669
    12
    Feb 4, 2010
    Good read. . . . . . Khan still sucks
     
  3. nutnfancy

    nutnfancy Guest

    Funniest response I've read today.:rofl
     
  4. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    Boxing fans will always be huge hypocrites. No matter what opinions they have. It just is what it is.
     
  5. lefthandlead

    lefthandlead Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,984
    878
    Jan 1, 2010
  6. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    93,172
    27,894
    Jan 18, 2010
    This is so true. :yep

    If a boxer beats a top class boxer out of nowhere he's suddenly concidered a top class fighter himself even if it was a fluke/one time deal.
    Then others that beat him afterwards suddenly get a simular boost, while they wouldn't have had that if they beat him before.

    Same bull goes for (former) beltholders that held belt(s) at a very weak period or got it with a box of cereal. They mostly are held in higher regard as stronger fighters that can never capture a belt because they have to deal with a very strong champ or corruption.
     
  7. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    Ali was the Challenger not Frazier, Joe was was the champion in their first fight.Get your facts straight.

    Also Tarver had won two of the belts vacated by Jones when he moved up and he was coming of four straight wins over legitimate top 10 Light heavyweights like Montell Griffin,Reggie Johnson,Chris Johnson and Eric Harding, he was a titlist and a legit challenger with good wins on his record.

    I get what you're saying but you have to do a better job at researching.
     
  8. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    You beat me to it.
     
  9. BlackBrenny

    BlackBrenny Guest

    lol
     
  10. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007

    i'm not talking about who had what belts though. I'm talking about who was favored and/or preferred in reality.... we all know as many say that belts do nothing but collect dust
     
  11. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    You had guys that were Champions(Frazier,Tarver) as challengers and Challengers(Ali,Jones) as Champions if you meant otherwise like you're saying now you would have said otherwise in the first place,now you're backtracking cause you were caught by others making **** up to make your argument look better ,period.

    Or make some stupid claim that Frazier hadnt fought anyone of worth before he fought Ali when Joe had wins over Jimmy Ellis,George Chuvalo,Jerry Quarry,Doug Jones, Eddie Machen and Oscar Bonavena. Just cause you dont know who those guys are or how good they were and probably have never seen any of them fight doesnt mean they were bums or journeyman, Most were top ten ranked heavyweights in a strong era and Ellis for example was a champion who had previously beat Floyd Patterson in one of his title defenses before Frazier destroyed him and took his title, You said Buster Mathis was his best win just cause you saw his undefeated record at boxrec at the time Joe fought him and assumed based on that undefeated record that he was the best win on Joe's ledger when that's not the case.

    typical of a boxrec warrior who dreams of fights after seeing a fight result at boxrec instead of actually take the time to watch the fights on film.

    Dont try to twist things up you messed up , just own it, learn from it and move on. Next time do some research before starting a thread, that way you will prevent things like this from happening.:deal
     
  12. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    Minor quibbles with what in general is a pretty solid post:

    * Jones was considered the LH champion by most observers, as he had not lost his titles in the ring. Tarver was a legit contender, though, having scored wins over several guys in the Top 10.

    * Ellis's win over Patterson was considered dubious at best. Probably better to cite his wins over guys like Quarry and Bonavena.

    Just nit-picking, really.
     
  13. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    No Worries mate.

    True that Jones was still considered by some observers like The Ring if i'm not mistaken to still be the man at LHW but there were others(fewer) who had Tarver in his place after he won the WBA and IBF belts vacated by Roy, even jones himself in a recent show about the super middleweights of the 90' said that for him to match Fitzsimmons feat he had to go back down to light heavy and regain his title after taking the title from Ruiz, Jones himself didnt consider himself the champion at 175 anymore, but theres truth in what you said and when the first fight between Tarver and Roy happened most thought that Roy not Tarver was the man at 175 (and in boxing cause he was pfp 1 at the time of the fight).

    About Ellis-Patterson you're absolutely right it was one of the controversial losses that Floyd had in his career just like his losses to Maxim and Quarry where most observers had Floyd winning those fights but the judges and the ref gave it to the other guys.I stand corrected.

    Always feel free to nit pick-mate, i dont know everything about the sport(far from it) and i'm always open to learn new stuff and being corrected if i'm wrong (was a bit harsh on the OP but we go back a long time so no harm done there, sometimes its him that comes at me others its me,its all for fun its never personal).:good
     
  14. m8te

    m8te Oh you ain't know? Full Member

    10,224
    2
    May 28, 2009
    Credentials
     
  15. flashy k.o

    flashy k.o Supporter of E.E fighters Full Member

    15,275
    75
    Oct 21, 2011
    :hi:
    Khan has to beat Berto to earn a shot to Floyd. Karras beat Berto, so he's the next guy lined up for Floyd. :yep