For my 5,000th post : My Pound-for-Pound Top 50 Fighters of All-Time..

Tough one - plenty of people have Lewis #1 full stop.

Calzaghe would be in the 6-10 bracket alongside the likes of Ricky Hatton, Lloyd Honeyghan and any three of about eight others.

 

Good list but no Sugar Ray Leonard.

 

Nevermind I just saw him at 13.

 

its a pretty good list .im not going to argue with the place cause thats always debatable but i would have Fighting Harada and Dick Tiger in there.

 

James Toney makes my Top 50....

 

he didnt saw Greb but he probably saw some of the fighters that Greb beat on film.and he beat some great fighters.

 

good list and very good 5oooth post, although i aint heard of some of the names you have on there think im gonna have to do some research! I would personally have mayweather higher than bernard hopkins on a pound for pound list. ps this is my first ever post:nut

 

Good list one of the better one's that I've seen here.

 

His ranking would obviously be based on his accomplishments. The fact that there is no available footage doesn't take away from the fact that the man existed and accomplished phenomenal things, arguably greater than anyone else who's ever fought outside of maybe Langford, another fighter with little footage.

 

Yep - Not bad actually, although I'd have Fitzsimmons inside the top 10 - Maybe at 9.

 

RJJ has a good resume. Beat a lot of good fighters, some ATG's and HoF's. And was spectacular. I don't see a problem with it. Hopkins should be higher, but I don't think higher than Roy.


I mean his resume could've been even better, like everyone's can. But certain fights couldn't be made or didn't come off, doesn't take away from the fights and fighters he fought in their prime who were elite, and future ATG's. Everyone who has ever fought, even if they have good wins will be criticized in someway. They do it to everyone, even the best.