For one night only:Were Ali and Frazier of the FOTC the 2 best Heavyweights?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by ribtickler68, Feb 5, 2015.


  1. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    8,875
    Oct 8, 2013
    I wholeheartedly agree. I always place Schmeling in my top 20 heavies of all time. He is sorely underrated. Possessed not a good but a great right hand. Great power, technique, deadly accurate. Had a solid defense, great endurance, great resolve to win. His in fighting is also underrated. He often pity patted on the inside but then would blister a combination as he pulled back.
    Fought 5 hall of famers at heavy defeated four of them.
    1-1 Louis
    1-1 Sharkey (should be 2-0)
    1-0 Walker
    1-0 Stribling
    0-1 Baer
    Had he fought Braddock as he rightfully earned he would be the first two time heavy weight champion I am sure of it.
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,394
    83,260
    Nov 30, 2006
    Yeah, no way does Schmeling lose to Braddock IMO.

    Not in 37, or anytime.
     
  3. Tvrdorah

    Tvrdorah New Member Full Member

    46
    0
    Jan 27, 2015
    I respect your opinion, but I disagree.

    In my opinion, Ali from late '73 (Norton II) to late '74 (Rumble in the Jungle) was much better than TFOTC Ali.

    And Ali from '67 was quite a bit better than that. ^

    Ali would have been even better during 69-70 if there was no layoff (real prime). ^
     
  4. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,132
    8,586
    Jul 17, 2009

    I certainly agree that Ali was better in the period you mention (September 1973-October 1974) than he was in March 1971. Just as fast,sharper,and in better condition.
     
  5. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,139
    13,095
    Jan 4, 2008
    Ali's legs weren't nearly the same and those were one of his primary resources, so no, he was not the second best HW of all time behind Frazier that night.

    And Frazier wasn't the best. As an exhibition of will and doggedness it was as as good as any, but skill wise it was good but not top notch. His game plan rested after all on that he was prepared to take two, three punches to land one of his own. He managed it against Ali, since Ali wasn't a heavy puncher and punched himself tired after 4-5 rounds after losing his best years to idleness. Still it was enough for Joe never to be the same again.

    That's just not good enough to beat every other HW. How would he fare against contemporary and former fighters like Louis, Liston and Foreman, who would be more than happy to trade punch for punch with Frazier? Not to mention Tyson, Bowe and Lewis?

    No chance in hell that he'll beat all of those guys. Quite possibly not any of them.
     
  6. MrPR

    MrPR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,197
    34
    Mar 23, 2009
    I don't ever see how Frazier could overcome powerhouses like Joe Louis , Sonny Liston , George Foreman .

    Those are stylistic nightmares for him .

    Hes loses 10 out of 10 times .

    I believe even Ron Lyle gets the best of Frazier .

    That's no disrespect to smokin Joe . He was a True animal .
     
  7. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Good post.
     
    Bokaj likes this.