can you answer it for him, which is it, pac is an overhyped cherrypicker or pac has been on A-Side meth, that's why hes been better at 130 and above? you guys want to have your cake and eat it too.
EY ULI...U remember how they said "FLOYD WILL COME UP WITH SOMETHING ELSE EVEN IF SHANE MOSLEY SAYS YES TO THE TESTS" WE DONT HERE ABOUT THAT ANYMORE DO WE:rofl:good
as you say, floyd has all the advantages. why is he still so afraid of the smaller, lesser-reach, styles disadvantage, no-defense and one-dimensional pacquiao? does he want all the advantages that he still want to take away the A-side meth out of pac's system?
Oh yeah... The BLIND love they have for Pac, and the abnormal hate they have for Floyd is astonishing! How many suicides in the philipines the day Pac gets humiliated by Mayweather!
Which is why the fight isn't made. Floyd wants to call the shots and dictate the fight negotiations......Manny doesn't want to give him that. Floyd could take PAC's request and drop the testing and the fight is made....or better yet...the fight would have been history WITHOUT the allegations or demands which was scheduled for March 13th 2010. Floyd has an even playing field...he actually hold advantages in being the bigger man in his natrual weight class. PAC agreed to random testing and unlimted urine random testing. He just had his own requirments on how close to the fight the random testing can go.
Exactly!!!!! If Pacquiao is so easy to beat why even question if he is roids. The author made Pacquiao sound like an amateur.
because you haters hate so much that you failed to realize the irony in them. first you think pac looked good above 130 because he is picking his opposition, that means according to the haters, pac is not that good to begin with. and then, haters accuse him of A-side Meths because they think that he is too good and much better when he was at the lower weights (130 and below) and think that only the A-side Meth improved him. chronic haters like uli cannot even distinguish the irony in it.
what im sayin is its clear that the poster doesnt have the perspective your referencing at all.... CALLING HIM AN OVERHYPED CHERRYPICKER ( I DONT BELIEVE HE IS A CHERRYPICKER HOWEVER I DONT GIVE HIM RIDICULOUS CREDIT LIKE U) AND MAKING A STATEMENT THAT HIS KO PERCENTAGE WENT UP IS TWO DIFFERENT ITEMS.. PUGA STOP TRYING TO TWIST A POSTERS WORDS AROUND ALL THE TIME AND ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS..EVERYONE ALWAYS ANSWERING YOURS AND THAN U TWIST THE POSTERS WORDS AROUND TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE THEY ARE CONTRADICTING THEMSELVES.. JUST STOP TWISTING THE WORDS...WHEN SOMEONE ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION STOP ASKING ANOTHER FOLLOW UP QUESTION AND ANSWER THAT POSTERS QUESTION BACK:good WHEN U AVOID THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF YOUR ARGUMENT WHICH IS "FLOYD WANTS THE TESTS CUZ HE REALLY BELIEVES MANNY ON SOMETHING" THAN IT SHOWS THE WEAKNESS IN YOUR ARGUMENT...THANKS