For the people insisting Rocky was "hard to hit" and had "underrated cleverness"

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Glass City Cobra, Oct 23, 2024.


  1. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,367
    26,598
    Jun 26, 2009
    Louis throwing shade at Mike Tyson before Mike was even born!

    Your complete quotes talk about how he improved. Perhaps the people who are saying the things you mention in the thread title are talking about Rocky’s best self, not the version who was on the rise but still learning.

    One hallmark of greatness in any athlete in any sport is the ability to continue to improve and hone their skills rather than reach a plateau and stay there. (Dang, now it sounds like I’m throwing shade at Tyson.)
     
  2. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    10,596
    18,176
    Jan 6, 2017
    1) But we're discussing the fossilized remains of a gunshy Louis saying that Rocky was "easy to hit". Not prime sharp shooter Louis with killer instinct letting his hands go.

    2) Did I ever once in the history of the forum suggest Rocky was successful for no reason? He earned every win and worked hard. No denying that.

    3) You can absolutely become successful in a weak era without having multiple "outstanding" qualities. In Rocky's case, his best qualities were stamina/work rate, making his awkward loopy swarming style work for him, his good clubbing power to wear guys down, etc.

    4) I didn't say he had zero defense whatsoever. I just think his fans vastly overrate his defense.
     
    Reinhardt, Spreadeagle and mcvey like this.
  3. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    10,596
    18,176
    Jan 6, 2017
    Yes, Rocky did improve. But some of the mistakes in the Louis fight didn't just vanish into thin air permanently either.

    Speaking of Tyson, in h2h discussions or skill evaluation, we don't only cherry pick 2-3 peak performances and ignore whatever doesn't look so great. Same applies to Rocky.
     
    Spreadeagle likes this.
  4. Pat M

    Pat M Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,705
    4,253
    Jun 20, 2017
    Pull counters are nice. They are not easy to time, but when they work they are effective. It's usually better to roll, pull back or slip, than to block. It gives you two hands to counter an opponent who has missed and might be temporarily off balance.

    We were taught to use the uppercut in a similar way. If the opponent was coming forward, throwing punches, not respecting your punch, we were taught to take a half step back, turning (torquing) the body at the same time and, when the rear foot set, throw an uppercut while pivoting the rear foot and shifting the weight to the front. It works with the rear hand or the front hand, of course you have to torque the body the opposite way if using the lead hand uppercut. When the timing worked out it was nice, even if it didn't work, it gave the other guy something to think about. And from the rear hand uppercut, a weight shift from front to back with a follow up hook, from the front hand uppercut, a weight shift from rear foot to front and the follow up cross. (there are so many people fighting out of a "southpaw" stance now that I try to use front and back hands instead of left and right.)
     
    BCS8, greynotsoold and Journeyman92 like this.
  5. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    10,596
    18,176
    Jan 6, 2017
    I definitely don't "hate" Marciano. I have him top 10 h2h for all men under 200 lbs. He was a force of nature and he also has a very good resume all things considered.

    I only push back against blatant hero worship and agendas lacking any sort of intellectual honesty, which some members (not you) are very guilty of. Some are so bad I do not even bother addressing them anymore.
     
    Spreadeagle likes this.
  6. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 MONZON VS HAGLER 2025 banned Full Member

    19,057
    21,097
    Sep 22, 2021
    Thanks for the info, this was the technique I was referring to that both Toney and Marciano do - @cross_trainer this is the clip 44 seconds in against Ruiz, Toney dips this way throughout and very often at heavyweight because he’s too short to take it on the shoulder.
    This content is protected
     
    Pat M and cross_trainer like this.
  7. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 MONZON VS HAGLER 2025 banned Full Member

    19,057
    21,097
    Sep 22, 2021
    cross_trainer likes this.
  8. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,367
    26,598
    Jun 26, 2009
    Actually, most do.

    They put an asterisk by every Tyson loss as if it didn’t happen. “He had sex in Tokyo.” “Evander butted him.” “He didn’t really lose, he got DQ’d. Could happen to anybody.” “He was old” x3.

    They also ignore flogs like Bonecrusher and act as if Tony Tucker was a hall of famer just for standing upright, etc.

    Most on here evaluate the best version of a guy. I think, and Louis expressed the same, that Rocky was a better fighter later. He wasn’t perfect, I don’t think he beats quite a few guys I can name, but he was better than who he fought each time he fought them, and while older some of those guys were great fighters (Ezz, Walcott, Moore).

    This version of Joe was on a nice run beating some decent opposition before running into Rocky. No, it wasn’t the prime version of Louis but as Joe himself noted, it wasn’t the best Marciano would be either.
     
    Jackomano, BCS8 and cross_trainer like this.
  9. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,598
    36,875
    Jul 4, 2014
    Guys often say bad things about the guys they lose to. We have posted the quotes many times where opponents said he was awkward and hard to hit. It's because he fought out of a very low crouch, using his lack of height to an advantage.
     
  10. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,704
    80,983
    Aug 21, 2012
    Louis was coming off a decent winning streak was he not?

    But yeah: compared to his heyday he was significantly diminished, I will agree with that.
     
  11. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,704
    80,983
    Aug 21, 2012
    If it's me the snark is always just bubbling under the surface, in case anybody is confused :D
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  12. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,704
    80,983
    Aug 21, 2012
    I like Marciano. He's just an anomaly in that I wouldn't pick him to beat a lot of the guys that he did beat (on paper) but in the ring, when its the 13th and the other dude is all lumps, I have to wonder how I could have been so wrong. Marciano simply doesn't LOOK like he ought to have been a world champion, nevermind an ATG.
     
  13. Cojimar 1946

    Cojimar 1946 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,754
    1,713
    Nov 23, 2014
    Under 200 pounds you have
    Dempsey
    Louis
    Patterson
    Spinks
    Holyfield
    Moorer
    Roy Jones
    James Toney
    Andre Ward
    Artur Beterbiev
    Dmitri Bivol

    Seems like a pretty formidable group. How many of them do you have him beating?
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,737
    29,088
    Jun 2, 2006
    "I couldn't avoid Louis' jabs I just had to take them."Marciano.
     
  15. Marvelous_Iron

    Marvelous_Iron Active Member Full Member

    1,126
    1,417
    Jul 9, 2022
    His crudeness was part of what made him awkward and difficult, you might be able to hurt him a bit but he's gonna hurt you a lot worse
     
    BoxingFan2002 likes this.