Pac won round 1 ...2 reasons he hit JMM more...His punches were heavier than JMM. Those werent jabs he was hitting him with. Emmanuel, a PAC hater mentioned if you guys were listening. PACs grazing punches does more damage than JMMs punches..how can he tell? It was there live, he saw it. Why else would he mention that? And he mentioned it 10 times during the fight As a matter of fact. If you go by that criteria, that Pacs punches did more damage..then Pac should have been given rounds where he was ahead in compubox..and dont say those were jabs..both men barely threw the jab
LOL Dude....get a ****en grip. YOu sound like a salty ass ***** who lost a mother ****en bet last Saturday. PAC won b/c he landed the harder shots....he matched JMM in punches landed, he may not have been as accurate but his punches did more damage and PAC controlled the pace of the fight. What is with all the ****en ******ed questions about how one can think PAC won....IT'S OBVIOUS why he got the Nod...he beat JMM up more than Juan beat PAC up.
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl You must have that "NEW CRACK".....the one that sends your ass in to anther demension. Especially if you think for a second Juan landed the cleaner and harder shots!:nut :nut :nut
after the third round KD JMM became allot reserved then he was going into round 2 he was content to wait on Pac to make mistakes, which pac would get the better of ,also Pac was taking allot more chances through out the fight then JMM , which had to stick in the minds of the judges . The fight could have gone ether way but the KD in 3 and the near KD in 10 tilted a bit in Pac favor ..
was not a very clear win if you just saw it once...a JMM fan will think he won, and a Pac fan will do the same. Saying that either fighter won by a large margin will be deemed bias and i will agree on that. I guess almost everyone has explained how they saw it, but at the end of the day, Pac was announced as the winner, and thats how it will be from now on.