Foreman v Dempsey,Tyson,Marciano,Tua?

Maybe. Like I said before, I've gone back & forth on it. 50/50 fight (right now I lean toward Foreman 55:45/60:40).

Don't see this at all. Other than power, Tua has nothing to beat Foreman with. Plus, as we know - Foreman was durable AF. Tua gets pummeled.

 

I'd favor Foreman over all of them but give Tyson the best chance. I don't consider Tyson a swarmer though. Of all the swarmers (Frazier, Marciano, Dempsey) I might actually give Dempsey the best chance, he probably has the best track record against big men (though it goes without saying Willard, and Firpo are no Foreman), and he has a huge speed advantage, and more importantly an excellent right hand, which has historically been proven to be the hand to use against Foreman, that Frazier unfortunately lacked.

I'd give Marciano the least chance (almost none) mainly because (along with all his other disadvantages) unlike Frazier and Dempsey, he doesn't even have a speed advantage over Foreman.

 

You picked George to beat Mike (which I agree with) in 3 rounds (which I don't agree with) but gave all the other 3 (2 of them that would be LHW'S/CW's today) a much better chance

Dempsey gets taken out inside 2

Marciano in the same

Tua either goes the distance (losing wide) or gets stopped inside 10.

None of these guys do better than Tyson.

 

I see it 60:40 for Tyson

Foreman is clearly favorite, but Tua can sure punch, and Foreman ain't exactly the epitome of skill

 

None of them except Dempsey came forward as aggressively as Mike, playing right into Foreman's hands.

In fact, as I write that I have to change my mind and say Jack gets stopped even sooner than Mike (almost solely due to having a similarly insistent incoming style)...but Mike can't come in the way he does and last more than 3 rounds against George. In fact, I don't give him 2.

But all respect for your opinions

Mike would get pulverized.

 

Endurance and maybe a better right hand, better defense

 

Dempsey no swarmer
Nevertheless the other guys have good chances due to foremans **** poor defense swamer or not

 

I agree. Don't get me wrong. I wouldn't favor any of the swarmers, on your list to beat Foreman but gun to my head, Dempsey has the best chance.

 

I don't bet but I would say Foreman likely beats them all

 

Might have had a better right, dont know harder or not
Dempsey maybe a swarmer in the duran mold most likely boxer puncher and had a reach to him
Ali, lyle, young found it plenty easy to land repeatedly on foreman and even even powder puff hitting young put foreman on his butt
Foreman was vulnerable