foreman ~vs~ arreola!

'Cause Adamek went easy on him. Look at him, he was toying with McBride. Like a cat toys with its prey.

Adamek would do exactly the same to Foreman too :hey

 

Brutal, brutal one sided beating, prime Foreman destroys Arreola inside 3 rounds.

Even the 90's Foreman would be too much for Arreola and stop him in 8-9 rounds. Boxers like Axel Schultz gave 90's Foreman problems but Arreola is no boxer. He is simply too crude, even compared to Morrison who was smart enough not to trade with Foreman was a much more skilled fighter than Arreola.

 

Are you from sunny old England Hook? Lots of old south east slang in your posts brother.

I'm pretty sure Dude is ****ing about.

Arreola is what Foreman would be like if he had radiation sickness, he is like a far weaker shitty version of old fat Foreman.

 

True but ill seen guys like Alex Stewart give him all he wanted and no one would of argued with a draw or even a Stewart win. Stewart was ok but not any better than Arreola,not as sturdy and not nearly as busy. I mean Crawford Grimsley? I think Arreola is a tougher fight than Savarese too,who gave Foreman a good competetive fight. Pierre Coetzer (whowent 8)? Solid gate keeper but i think Arreola would put up a better fight.
Im not saying Arreola beats him but he pushes big GEORGE and gives him all hell in a close fight, if it doesnt go the distance Arreola lets an Old George know he was in a tough fight..... Big George was smart, very dangerous,big punching,tough and game but he was slow and got hit too much..For as dangerous as he was he was also very beateable by any legit or fringe contender, imo overrated in his 2nd career.. And im a Foreman fan.

 

Arreola too big too strong for the smaller Foreman. Todays heavyweights way too big for those old overrated oldtimers.

Arreola went the distance with Vitali Klitschko, who is bigger and strong and hits harder than Foreman

Because Shannon Briggs said so

 

THats why Arreola would have hung with the old George... STill think OlD George hit a little harder than Vitali. and probably at least as strong.. But He was just slow on the trigger(except for jab) and not as aggressive or mean, he only knocked out tomotoe cans early in his 2nd career.. Reason i think Arreola would hang in there and make it close is because he would throw more that George and probably even land more..... Not the case with young George,who would end it.

 

Arreola is underrated and Foreman very overrated.

Arreola would be too big, too slick for the ponderous Foreman.

 

SOme truth to the first statement(at least an old George)
But it would be a war...BOth would get beat up and look like a mess when it was over.

 

dude, i was taking the ****

Old Foreman would be popping in that Jab in Arreolas face

hell Briggs and Morrison would beat Arreola

 

Sultan Ibragimov would handily beat Arreola....Roland LaStarza would have beaten Chris.

 

Billy Conn would have beaten Arreola easily.

 

Hook for the first time EVER i agree with you....



Any version of big George easily disposes of arreola.....Chris just isnt refined enough to box george

 

Morrison -Arreola would be pickem,,Imagine bigger Joe Hipp with power.

a motivated Briggs could win but anything less,and Arreola takes him.

I do agree FOreman would have ****ed him up with the jab,,but i could see arreola lasting the distance and dishing out his own punishment...Old Geroge would win but it would be competetive.

 

Very easily.

 

Savaese and Alex Stewart werent any better than Arreola...Infact id pick Chris over those 2 who gave Old George a good fight.