foreman ~vs~ arreola!

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by naldo marshal, Jul 9, 2011.


  1. Savarese and Stewart were better than Arreola by far and you know why they were? They didnt spend their careers fighting tomato cans. When Stewart and Savarase stepped up they lost. But hey at least they stepped up.

    Wow Arreola fought Vitali? Big deal. It only shows how bad Arreola is because the Klit brothers only fight people they know they can beat.

    Shannon Briggs said Vitali hit harder than Foreman and Lewis. And you believe this because of? Lewis knocked him out. A in shape Briggs ran from Foreman's power not to mention Foreman was closed to 50 and seem to care less about boxing now.

    Areolla was bigger than a prime Foreman? Wrong, Fatter but not bigger. Foreman was 6'3 230 pounds of muscle at a 19 year older and lost weight because alot of fighters came in the ring lighter back then to gain speed.

    In version of Foreman would destroy Chris Arreola.

    Next we are going to make a thread about who would win between Butterbean and Mike Tyson