Scorecards in boxing are rarely very informative in close fights. They suffer from inaccuracy, subjectivity, bias, and lack of precision. Putting aside who won "on the score cards" or on your score card, who do you think "won"? This is to say, who got the better of whom on the whole. Who had the better punches? The more impressive blows? Who got beat up worse? In short, who would you have rather been, Pascal or Hopkins?
I rather be the legend..and not the flash in the pan. I rather be the guy that put on the great fight for everyone...and not the guy with the frown who looks like he witnessed a robbery.. I rather be a partner with goldenboy and running golden boy east.
and how do you guys feel about the notion of majority draw? All regulations aside, I do believe that although two judges had it a draw and one judge has it for one fighter, than the victory should go to him.