forman in my opinion was the best of his era and althought ali beat him he would not give him that rematch even ali himself said he could not match forman and the only way to beat him was to tire him out
Well you have sort of stated the obvious, but why would Ali give him a rematch he beat him fair and square?
Somone's opinion isn't solid just because they aren't the best of spellers?,or are not bothered to spell better?,i think thats a little small minded. Maybe really poor spelling says their an idiot,but maybe think if their dyslexic or something?. or that their opinion can be vailid without perfect spelling!.
Foreman was just a hugely tough *******, he was not even that big, but **** he could hit. Only Tua or maybe Shavers hit harder.
Look Foreman was a beast, styles make fights Ali done him fair and square took some real punishment but done him, Foreman smashed Fraizer and he was regarded as the best heavyweight in the world bar Ali and to be fair out of the three fights Fraizer shared with Ali, Fraizer should of won 2 of them if he got his arse of the stool for the 15th it was his for the taking. You are right he is a freak of nature and who in there right mind would give him a rematch..
Well, a rematch can happen when a fight was close or controversial. When it was a dominating knock out then there is obviously no point
i have an email from George himself saying " Ali wasn't the best fighter or the best boxer i have seen, but on that night, i could never beat that Ali "
yes of course very clever but thats why he would not rematch because the same trick would not work twice was my sorta point in that saying