FOTW #19: Joe Calzaghe Double (Reid and Hopkins; Bonus: Lacy)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, Feb 25, 2019.


  1. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    In rewatching it, I didn't think Reid did enough to win many rounds. But he landed almost all of the most meaningful punches in the fight, and the vast majority of Calzaghe's work was more flash than substance. I think the time that I scored this fight a draw, I was probably being a bit too stingy about awarding Calzaghe rounds based on harmless punching.
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  2. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Basically how I see it. I'll rescore this fight (I'm behind in some fights), but agree with these sentiments. Joe wouldn't know what a solid punch landing felt like in this fight. Hopkins' antics are well known in this fight, and he simply didn't push the fight enough. If you ask me who I came away feeling like was the better boxer... it would be Hopkins. If you ask me who was the busier fighter and had the easier case for winning a verdict based on aggression and output it would be Joe.
     
    Holler, Webbiano, Pat M and 1 other person like this.
  3. 88Chris05

    88Chris05 Active Member Full Member

    1,393
    3,223
    Aug 20, 2013
    I'm pretty sure that even Reid himself admitted in his post-fight interview (or soon after the fight in any case) that Calzaghe deserved the nod, and that he 'didn't do enough' on the night. I also remember Reid saying that a rematch was agreed upon in principle, but that he and his team declined it as they felt the offer from Calzaghe and Warren (around £100k, I believe) was an insult to them. It was only years later, when Calzaghe was a bigger name and when Reid was desperate for any kind of payday, that he started crying robbery in order to drum up interest in a second fight.

    That said, it was a pretty good fight and worth another look. I ended up with 115-113 to Calzaghe. Reid won some of his rounds bigger than Calzaghe did when he started landing those crunching right hands (such as rounds 5, 6, and 9) but Reid struggled with Calzaghe's speed early on (he looked better when he stopped waiting on Calzaghe and fought more aggressively, going for the right rather than trying to jab and counter) which gave him an early deficit to deal with, and Calzaghe also looked much fresher in the home straight and produced a good couple of rounds at the end to make sure of it.

    Rounds 1, 4, 7 and 10 were the debatable and very close rounds, for me, but I think you'd have to give Reid all of them to have him as the winner (personally I gave him the first and the tenth, with the seventh a 10-10). So I gave Calzaghe rounds 2, 3, 4, 8 (a 10-8 because of Reid's point deduction), 11 and 12, with round 7 a draw. That leaves Reid winning rounds 1, 5, 6, 9 and 10.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As for Calzaghe-Hopkins...Wow, what a stinker. On previous viewings (when it happened and then again back in 2012-13), I had Calzaghe very narrowly winning. This time, I had 114-114. Hopkins won the first (10-8), second, third, seventh and tenth. Calzaghe the fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth, ninth and twelfth. I had the eleventh as a 10-10.

    The only spell of 'domination' in the fight was rounds one to three, where Hopkins was clearly the better man and looked as if he might run away with it. Calzaghe was even getting outworked in those rounds, as well as outboxed and hustled on the inside. Once he settled down he ground out enough rounds without ever looking particularly good, but Hopkins stunk the place out horrendously after the midway point. Calzaghe's engine and fitness won him this one, nothing else; from a technical standpoint, he looked awful. Hopkins' subsequent wins over Pavlik, Pascal and Cloud mean that it ended up looking like a good win on his record, which it was - but the fight also left me in little doubt about who'd have won if they'd have met, for instance, at 168 a few years earlier.
     
  4. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,494
    7,259
    May 18, 2006
    These two were both ranked top 5 p4p in the world at the time from memory. You'd never guess it from watching it.

    An ugly, boring, negative, mauling sh1tshow. I give it to Joe because he didn't shame himself by faking fouls like Hopkins did. Kudos to the guys who have gone back and scored this round by round. You're keener fans than I. I'll never put myself through watching this again...ughhh
     
    Holler and Pat M like this.
  5. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,100
    15,580
    Dec 20, 2006
    ??? You score fights against guys because they are poor actors??? That is the most unique system I have heard apart from Mendoza scoring based upon punch stats and media consensus
     
    NoNeck likes this.
  6. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,494
    7,259
    May 18, 2006
    I thought it was an awful fight that neither really deserved to win when I watched it live. Because Hopkins carried on like a plonker I was happy that the decision went against him. I've never actually sat and scored properly it because that would entail re-watching it again and that's never going to happen, probably means I shouldn't even comment on this thread but whatever.

    FYI my actual scoring system involves factors such as whether a fighter threw a bolo punch, whose trunks has the best sequins and embroidery and whose nickname I like the most.
     
    Holler, Pat M and PhillyPhan69 like this.
  7. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Hopkins - Calzaghe: 115-115.

    Looks like I scored it a draw this time.

    R1: Hopkins 10-8

    R2: Even

    R3: Even

    R4: Calzaghe

    R5: Calzaghe (close)

    R6: Hopkins (fighting very dirty, using his head even more blatantly than Vito)

    R7: Hopkins, just barely. Not sure Calzaghe landed a single meaningful punch. Most were slaps or off-target. I agree with Max Kellerman on that round—I would have rather been Hopkins.

    R8: Calzaghe

    R9: Calzaghe

    R10: Hopkins. Hopkins’ low blow charade was pathetic.

    R11: Even? This low blow act was even more pathetic than the first one.

    R12: Calzaghe (one of the uglier rounds with a lot of sloppy, ineffective punches)
     
    young griffo and Pat M like this.
  8. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,100
    15,580
    Dec 20, 2006
    As a Hopkins fan I totally agree with your round 11 thoughts. I did find the first low blow an overdone acting job, but at least I can justify that or find it defendable. Hits in the nuts hurt, and some more than others. But that was a legit hit, and I can’t fault a fighter for taking the full use of their time for another fighters infraction...but I don’t even think the one you were referring to was even a borderline low blow. That was pretty bad! I don’t know if he wanted another rest or if he knew how close the fight was and was getting real creative to have a point deducted from joe? Either way it was a poor fake job
     
    young griffo likes this.
  9. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,100
    15,580
    Dec 20, 2006
    I am going to tabulate this weeks Cards in a few hours if anyone still wants to get their cards in.

    The threads are always open and you can revisit them anytime to post thoughts and cards, I just try to calculate them at the end of the week
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  10. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,100
    15,580
    Dec 20, 2006
    Calzaghe vs Reid

    4 cards submitted with a UD for Joe Calzaghe

    RBR consensus
    1 Draw 2-2-0
    2 Calzaghe 4-0-0
    3 Calzaghe 4-0-0
    4 Calzaghe 4-0-0
    5 Reid 4-0-0
    6 Reid 2-0-2
    7 Draw 1-1-2
    8 Calzaghe 4-0-0
    9 Reid 4-0-0
    10 Reid 3-0-1
    11 Calzaghe 2-1-1
    12 Calzaghe 2-1-1

    Calzaghe 6-4-2 116-114

    We agreed on 6 rounds
    Calzaghe 2-3-4-8
    Reid 5-9
    With 6 split rounds.

    We had 7 Even/Draw rounds...some pretty close swing rounds

    Calzaghe Cards
    @Pat M 115-114
    @mrkoolkevin 116-114
    @PhillyPhan69 116-111
    @88Chris05 115-113
     
    Pat M, Holler and mrkoolkevin like this.
  11. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,100
    15,580
    Dec 20, 2006
    Calzaghe vs Hopkins
    4 cards submitted
    MD Draw 3 draw cards 1 Calzaghe card

    RBR
    1 Hopkins (10-8) 4-0-0
    2 Hopkins 2-1-1
    3 Hopkins 3-0-1
    4 Calzaghe 3-0-1
    5 Calzaghe 4-0-0
    6 Calzaghe 3-1-0
    7 Draw 2-2-0
    8 Calzaghe 4-0-0
    9 Calzaghe 4-0-0
    10 Hopkins 3-0-1
    11 Draw 1-1-2
    12 Calzaghe 4-0-0

    Calzaghe 6-4-2 or 115-114 by consensus

    Calzaghe card
    @Pat M 117-111

    Draw cards
    @PhillyPhan69 114-114
    @88Chris05 114-114
    @mrkoolkevin 115-115
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2019
    Pat M and mrkoolkevin like this.
  12. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    @mark ant - You seem to really dig Calzaghe's style. Curious to see how you would assess and score these fights.
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.