FOTY Anti-Freedom Edition

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by OvidsExile, Apr 8, 2015.


  1. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    Is English even your first language?

    Or are you claiming you were being ironic when you wrote.

    " Neither is American, but that was nowhere even close to being the FOTY in that year."

    Any list of fights having NON American participants in which the FOTY between Gatti, and Ruelas is mentioned can not be a " bungle " by definition.

    Some might fall for the ironic excuse if that is what you are claiming, but I'd say it was back tracking.

    As I said don't take up teaching English ( particularly the written word ) any time soon.

    Perhaps you would like to ask another English guy to explain what you are trying to write for me, because it is all incoherent mumbo jumbo as far as I can see.
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,390
    83,258
    Nov 30, 2006
    :patsch

    OMG, you dunce! :lol:

    The "bungle" in question never had anything to do with Gatti (or Ruelas) being American or non-American.

    Got that?

    From the very beginning, the bungle was Ring Mag calling Gatti vs. Ruelas the FOTY in 1997. It wasn't. Sirimongkol vs. Tatsuyoshi was. They got it wrong. Understand?

    The issue, therefore, isn't that Ring Magazine has a pro-US slant in lots of their FOTY selections from past years. The issue rather stems from the fact that most of the people making the FOTY selections @ Ring Mag just DKSAB. The editor that green-lit putting Gatti vs. Ruelas down as '97 FOTY is every bit as clueless as whatever editors included whichever fights involving Americans that O's Exile thought were bungles and inspired him to make his thread.
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,390
    83,258
    Nov 30, 2006
    You'll note that nobody else has expressed any confusion over what I originally wrote. Just you. The OP understood me just fine.
     
  4. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,221
    37,961
    Aug 28, 2012
    IB, I thought what you wrote was cogent and well written. I understood what you were saying perfectly. By the way, I just edited the OP to make Tatsuyoshi vs Sirimongkol FOTY in 97. Nobody else has expressed any confusion over what you wrote, but then nobody else has expressed any opinions about the conceit of the thread either. Although, I do thank Scartissue for the corrections he's made when I bungled a fight by not looking up the nationalities of fighters with foreign sounding names I was unfamiliar with.

    I wasn't trying to be arrogant and suggest that The Ring is biased toward Americans or that they don't know much about boxing. I have a lot of respect for the journalists at that magazine, in spite of how often I disagree with some of their more recent calls. However, this thread was actually prompted in part by how much I tend to agree with some of their calls in spite of their detractors. I find that many American fighters earned their accolades on merit rather than on bias.

    To some extent, I agree that the FOTY list could be better, but other times I find myself agreeing with it wholeheartedly. Was Ali vs Frazier I or Bobby Chacon vs Bazooka Limon IV the worst call they could have made those years? Far from it. But I do understand the frustration that many foreign fans feel when the big fish in their pond doesn't make the same splash in the pages of The Ring. Brazilians probably wanted Acelino Freitas on every cover. Ditto for Australians and Geale, or Germans and Sturm.

    I acknowledge that there is a skew that favors American fighters, but I don't think that it is nationalistic bias or racism, as is often suggested. Not that I think we are above such things, although in large part I believe we are. But on a worldwide scale in terms of racism, corruption, and things of that sort I'd give the US a 2/10 well below average.

    The real problem is the megaphone. Our fighters get more publicity. Our media spreads around the globe in ways that Japanese, Thai, South African, or Columbian media doesn't.

    The other problem is perspective. The Ring, I believe, is based in North America, and so are most of it's journalists. Therefore, most of the people they know are Americans, and most of their articles will be on Americans. It's not that they like Americans more. It's that their experience is quintessentially American and that's the lens they see the world through.

    The only way to correct that kind of perspective is through travel or hiring numerous foreign correspondents and probably opening branch offices in other countries. However, such networks of contacts are prohibitively expensive and time consuming to maintain, especially when The Ring probably doesn't have affiliates and distribution in most of these areas. The Ring tried for awhile. They used to have Ring En Espanol etc, but they got their pants beat off them by rival local boxing mags like Guantes. It also may be the case that The Ring sells more copies in America where English speaking American boxers are likely to move more paper than a Spanish speaking Cuban. Not that I know anything about their current business models, but there is likely a language barrier either at the reading end or the reporting side.

    Partially, this thread was started as a response to foreign posters who think that American's are all nationalistic/racist/corrupt/narcissistic/etc and partially it was born out of a real desire to learn. I find that making such lists are the equivalent of boxing homework projects. Or you could even think of them as an intellectual game. I saw IntentionalButt's thread on Sirimongkol Singwancha and it sparked my curiosity. I thought of how the last couple of years there have been fights like Akira Yaegashi vs Pornsawan Porpramook that many people said were worthy of fight of the year honors, but most people had never heard of and I was intrigued. I like to unearth hidden gems and snatch them from the aether. That's what I had in mind when I started this thread. It's not meant as an attack on the good men and women at The Ring.
     
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,390
    83,258
    Nov 30, 2006
    Excellent post, OE. For the record, I wasn't calling you arrogant. That was just riffing on Foxy saying it of me, as though anyone being critical of the holy Ring Mag would need to be "arrogant" to do so. I understood entirely that your critique of the rankings and FOTY selections is entirely a matter of identifying the flaws in the magazine's perspective and how it colored their judgment on some matters (to err is human) and not borne from some petty arrogance or agenda. :good
     
  6. Boxing Prospect

    Boxing Prospect Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,249
    5,725
    May 10, 2012
    Love the premise of this thread and would like to perhaps see a short list for every year maybe?
     
  7. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,221
    37,961
    Aug 28, 2012
    I was just thinking that I'd like to see a list of the runners up for every Ring fight of the year the way that Dan Rafael does in his columns. He usually goes five fights deep every year. Unfortunately, I had to s**** that thread idea because I don't own any of the would they be January or December issues of The Ring? And I don't know if they even archived said issues articles on their website.

    Good luck finding stuff from before 2005 on the internet. All the web pages have been dropped or reprogrammed since then. It's freaking impossible even finding old East Side Boxing threads about fights, ever since the name change. They say that nothing is ever lost, and you can find dead pages somehow, but I don't know how to necrotize a black mass for all this stuff. Wave a voodoo doll made of memory sticks or some ****. Finding what I've found for this thread has been hard enough.

    I have some alternates for a couple of years; but I couldn't even find one fight to put in some of them. I'll try to share some of what I got though. This is off of some sticky pads I jotted notes on, but I'll try to clean up some of the mess.

    06 Vazquez vs Gonzalez
    05 Jorge Arce vs Hussein Hussein
    02 Dorin vs Balbi
    01 Bojado vs Rubio
    00 Trinidad vs Vargas
    Hatakeyama vs Sakamoto
    95 Yuri Arbachakov vs Chatchai Sasakul I
    94 Onizuka vs Lee
    Joichiro Tatsuyoshi vs Yasuei Yakushiji
    89 Zaragoza vs Banke I
    Harding vs Andries
    88 Hideyuki Ohashi vs Jung Koo Chang
    87 Bassa vs McAuley
    86 Lora vs Vazquez
    Myung Woo Yuh vs Mario Alberto Demarco I
    84 Chang vs Tokashiki
    82 Limon vs Navarette
    Navarette vs Choi
    Katsuo Tokashiki vs Lupe Madera I
    81 Sanchez vs Gomez
    Pedrosa vs Ford
    80 Minter vs Antuofermo
    Lupe Pintor vs Alberto Davila II
    Kim vs Mathebula
    79 Pipino Cuevas vs Angel Espada
    Guty Espada vs Chan Hee Park
    77 Monzon vs Valdez II
    Carlos Palomino vs Armando Muniz I
    72 Masao Ohba vs Orlando Amores
    71 Laguna vs Buchanan
    70 Olivares vs Castillo II
    Mando Ramos vs Sugar Ramos
    Efren Torres vs Chartchai Chionoi I
    69 Rose vs Rudkin
    67 Ortiz vs Laguna
    60 Jofre vs Medel
    50 Fernandez vs Ortega

    The rest should be on the first post. I'm sure I screwed up somewhere and someone will be along shortly to tell me that half of these guys with the funny names are red blooded Americans and I should get my head out of my ass.
     
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,390
    83,258
    Nov 30, 2006
  9. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Puerto Ricans don't count as Americans??

    Anyway, 2003 had Michael Gomez-Alex Arthur. Great fight.
     
  10. Boxing Prospect

    Boxing Prospect Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,249
    5,725
    May 10, 2012
    Bump!

    2015-Vargas Vs Miura right?
     
  11. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,221
    37,961
    Aug 28, 2012
    I lean more toward Orlando Salido vs Roman Martinez I that year. But 2016 would definitely be Orlando Salido vs Francisco Vargas.
     
  12. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    1973-Taylor vs Anaya 1
    1977-Hong-Carrasquilla
    2015-Vargas vs Miura
    2016-Gonzalez vs Cuadras
     
    OvidsExile likes this.
  13. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,221
    37,961
    Aug 28, 2012
    I just watched Veeraphol Sahaprom vs Toshiaki Nishioka 2 from 2001 and it wasn't the barn burner I was lead to expect. Not bad, but not great either. It was kind of nice picturing them as Roman Gonzalez and Naoya Inoue but the fight didn't really heat up until round 7, and then it cooled a little.

    Sahaprom has a pretty impressive record, only losing to Nana Konadu and Hozumi Hasegawa in his first 56 fights, with 14 defenses of his title. And Nishioka goes on to beat Rafael Marquez and hold a title for seven fights before losing to Donaire. It was worth it just to see two high class operators at the lower weights even if it wasn't particularly exciting.

    I'm just going to have to look for something else to fill a slot for 2001. Erik Morales vs In Jin Chi looks promising.
     
  14. Boxing Prospect

    Boxing Prospect Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,249
    5,725
    May 10, 2012
    For 2001 - Takanori Hatakeyama Vs Rick Yoshimura?
     
    OvidsExile likes this.
  15. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,357
    26,572
    Jun 26, 2009
    Anything better for this category from 1976 than Benitez-Cervantes? Not a knock-down, drag-out but a great display of skill and counterpunching. And historically significant because Wilfred was 17 years old.
     
    OvidsExile likes this.