Fraizer beats wlad, i just don't know if he beats vitali

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Koman600, Nov 9, 2011.


  1. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008

    I've always felt that Vitali fights the guys with the style or mental makeup to beat Wlad. For instance, Arreola bum rushed Vitali. Had he done that to Wlad, he might have hit that chin.

    Vitali had the balls to stand up to him and hit back. Wlad went on to fight two cruiserweights.
     
  2. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    102
    Dec 26, 2009
    stop shitting on him you ****** wait a few weeks and let's face it you only heard of Frazier because of the news probably 50% of you robots have never heard of frazier up until recently

    and no frazier beats both klitschkos, he undoubtedly competed at a higher level then both
     
  3. SweetHome_Bama

    SweetHome_Bama Loyal Member banned

    32,270
    3
    Apr 30, 2010
    How tall was Chris Byrd? How tall was Lamont Brewster?

    Just asking. :)
     
  4. canis-lupus

    canis-lupus Guest

    Nah, i dont think so. Frasier was great, but his much too small to get under the wlad's skin..he would lost
     
  5. ko_bros

    ko_bros Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,088
    2
    Nov 13, 2008
    Dumb ****. Two cruiserweights?
    Are you trying to say that Haye is less dangerous than Arreola? If anything Wlad fought the most dangerous guy in HW and beat him with ease.

    If Vitaliy is the one who fight the tougher opposition then why did Wlad fought Peter twice, Brewster, Rahman, Jefferson all of them who are punchers?

    I love Vitaliy, but this **** is getting ridiculous.
     
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,185
    27,654
    Jan 3, 2007
    No I also mentioned that Vitali BEAT two of Wlad's conquerors. My comment was not just about who each man lost to..


    You may want to go watch that fight again.





    I'm assuming that you cought that little part in my original post about admitting that Wlad had the better resume, right? Because I was talking about Vitali possibly being the better man in a " head to head sense". And its not out of the question that he might be. He has the more solid chin, possibly more power, and has lost the fewest number of rounds of any champion in history. Wlad probably beat a few guys were better than some of Vitali's best, but the margin isn't that wide between the two lists, and in some cases its dead even...