Frampton vs Santa Cruz ll: Battle of the ducking disgrace.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by vladimir radchenko, Jan 28, 2017.


  1. lewis gassed

    lewis gassed The Bronze Dosser Full Member

    25,429
    19,508
    Nov 24, 2013
    There's always an undercard for him.
     
  2. rorschach51

    rorschach51 A Legend & A Gentleman Full Member

    12,195
    8,406
    Feb 18, 2012
    You seem to be confused what the difference is between a excuse and legitimate reason. There is no incentive to fight him, when they can make more putting on entertaining fights the people will watch. Like all professional sports, it's a business first and sport second. It's not a smart decision business wise or financial to fight Rigo, as soon as he becomes a draw everyone will fight him. He's gonna have to get a little more exciting to watch first.
     
  3. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,242
    Oct 7, 2006
    People watch the undercard and then when he fights they start changing the channel. Not good for business .
     
  4. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    I genuinely do see this bout as 'Battle of Rigondeaux's Sons'.
    Double duck.
     
  5. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    Neither were keen to get in the ring with Rigo that much is true.

    But there are a number of other very good fights out there for Rigo that he could pursue but isn't.
     
  6. rhin0z>

    rhin0z> Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,405
    1,089
    Jul 13, 2014
    excuse after excuse then more excuses.
     
  7. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    You're right. Excuses why certain fighters didn't fight Rigo and other excuses about why Rigo didn't fight others.