Frank Bruno (89) vs Mike Tyson (96)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Jay1990, Jan 4, 2018.


  1. Jay1990

    Jay1990 Active Member Full Member

    938
    193
    Sep 12, 2015
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Basically Tyson wasn`t at his best in `96 but was in better condition and more focused than he was in `89, Tyson was dreadful in their first fight his mind was all over the place after he sacked Rooney his body had lost it`s vim, in the second fight Bruno realised this and panicked, Bruno had just beaten McCall and was still at his peak, different level of fighters.
     
  3. KidDynamite

    KidDynamite Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,857
    1,513
    Sep 16, 2012
  4. UFC2015

    UFC2015 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,083
    380
    Sep 12, 2015
    No version of Bruno survives that combination to be honest, Bruno just didn't have the chin to survive Tyson.
     
  5. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    7,831
    13,124
    Oct 20, 2017
    Bruno would lose to Tyson at any stage of their respective careers except for the Tyson near the very end of his. But then if Danny Williams and Kevin McBride could beat Tyson by that point, it doesn't really mean much.