Who was better and who would win H2H? How do they compare to contenders of other eras (like Folley, Machen, Quarry, Ellis, Page, Coetzee) and of this era (Byrd, Haye, Klitschko)??
Rudduck wins...Greater might be debatable. As far as the other contenders listed they are on par and would likely win and lose through that list.
A typical Bruno experience,really. I see Frank's better overall boxing building up a points lead for him,only for Ruddock to start landing his 'smashes' as soon as Bruno tenses up and gets tired. Ruddock circa round nine.
Ruddock within 6 rounds. Wouldnt use the term 'greater', 'Better' would be my choice of words cos neither deserve the use of the word
Frank's best chance of winning would be to catch Ruddock early with his best shots. Tall order though.
Ruddock by late TKO with Big Frank ahead on the cards but slumped against the ropes looking half dead in yet another gallant defeat.
ruddock to win by tko but big frank is in with a real shout here cant say i see ruddock as greater than frank
I voted close fight, however ruddock has a hell of a chin and Power to boot. Frank outjabs/outboxes Ruddock, then gets caught late ending in TKO9. Or Frank outboxes Ruddock, then catches Ruddock with a monster right when he goes for his "Smash" 50/50 imo. Both guys could beat all the fighters that you listed