Frank Bruno vs Wladimir Klitschko Prime4Prime

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by yesihavearm2, Jan 11, 2009.


Page 1 of 3
  1. yesihavearm2

    yesihavearm2 ESB Chinchecker Full Member

    9,890
    5,155
    May 30, 2008
    How would you see this one going and your thoughts ?
     
    yesihavearm2, Jan 11, 2009
    yesihavearm2, Jan 11, 2009
    #1
  2. Infern0

    Infern0 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,854
    0
    Oct 9, 2008
    I have to go with Bruno, the guy was a beast in his prime, I know it's a battle of guys with Bad Jaw's, but Bruno would Nuke Wlad, i'm sure of it.
     
    Infern0, Jan 11, 2009
    Infern0, Jan 11, 2009
    #2
  3. yesihavearm2

    yesihavearm2 ESB Chinchecker Full Member

    9,890
    5,155
    May 30, 2008
    Bruno's chin might be a little suspect but its certainly better than Wlads ! Can you imagine him getting stopped by ROSS PURRITY !

    We also know that Bruno can take jabs but how is Wlad going to be able to cope with someone who can jab with him ? Bruno's power aswell would have Wlad hiding in a shell before being blasted out.

    Bruno by KO
     
    yesihavearm2, Jan 11, 2009
    yesihavearm2, Jan 11, 2009
    #3
  4. Infern0

    Infern0 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,854
    0
    Oct 9, 2008
    Yeah I agree, Bruno's jaw was always under-rated, It was rarely a one hit special that felled him like Wlad, By the way is that you in the pic, if so nice tat
     
    Infern0, Jan 11, 2009
    Infern0, Jan 11, 2009
    #4
  5. mrbassie

    mrbassie Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,206
    16
    Oct 18, 2004
    I think Bruno sparks him tbh. I just can't pick Wlad over punchers.
     
    mrbassie, Jan 12, 2009
    mrbassie, Jan 12, 2009
    #5
  6. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    "Battle of the robots"

    I take Wladimir by KO. I think he's better technically. Both can be hurt, but I see Wlad's superior skills and defence getting him into a position to hurt Bruno first. And we know Bruno can't recover for ****.
     
    TFFP, Jan 12, 2009
    TFFP, Jan 12, 2009
    #6
  7. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    He has never been blasted out with one shot.

    Imbecile.
     
    TFFP, Jan 12, 2009
    TFFP, Jan 12, 2009
    #7
  8. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Tough one......

    Give me ten minutes and I will make a judgement!
     
    Beeston Brawler, Jan 12, 2009
    Beeston Brawler, Jan 12, 2009
    #8
  9. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    4,429
    15
    Oct 2, 2006
    i think wlad is too good techinically and goes on to win a boring UD
     
    Benjiabc, Jan 12, 2009
    Benjiabc, Jan 12, 2009
    #9
  10. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    3
    Nov 28, 2007
    10 minutes X 13?
     
    TFFP, Jan 12, 2009
    TFFP, Jan 12, 2009
    #10
  11. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    :lol:

    OK.........

    Bruno by stoppage.

    He would be able to take Wlad's shots for longer than Wlad would be able to take his. Skills-wise they aren't that far apart, both pretty robotic, though Wlad is the better athlete of the two.
     
    Beeston Brawler, Jan 12, 2009
    Beeston Brawler, Jan 12, 2009
    #11
  12. trotter

    trotter Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,762
    2
    Apr 18, 2008
    Wlad late for me - because he knows how to clinch when he needs to.

    His reach with that jab would also be a factor, I think. I presume it's longer than Frank's.
     
    trotter, Jan 12, 2009
    trotter, Jan 12, 2009
    #12
  13. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Wlad 81, Frank 82
     
    Beeston Brawler, Jan 12, 2009
    Beeston Brawler, Jan 12, 2009
    #13
  14. trotter

    trotter Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,762
    2
    Apr 18, 2008
    'kin ell

    I met Bruno, and he didn't seem that big. And I'm only an average sized guy myself.

    That said I also saw Mason at London Bridge and he was shorter than I expected, very hefty top half though.
     
    trotter, Jan 12, 2009
    trotter, Jan 12, 2009
    #14
  15. Brummy1976

    Brummy1976 Guest

    6 ft 4 and 17 stone of lean muscles big mate no matter how you look at it !
     
    Brummy1976, Jan 12, 2009
    Brummy1976, Jan 12, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 3