Frank Bruno vs Wladmir Klitschko

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Tony Harrison, Feb 14, 2008.


  1. Sundance

    Sundance Active Member Full Member

    652
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Bruno was good at KO'ing washed up old men, blown up cruisers, bums, and shot fighters, I'll give you that. Anytime he came up against a decent puncher...robot dance.
     
  2. JonOli

    JonOli Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,352
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    Wlad would slowly break down bruno.
     
  3. Eubank

    Eubank Active Member Full Member

    1,264
    1
    Mar 22, 2008
    Bruno would flatten him after 5-6 rounds. Far too good and Wlad does not have the work rate to cause Bruno stamina problems.
     
  4. columbo man

    columbo man Active Member Full Member

    1,000
    1
    Jan 18, 2008
    i can see this fight going one of two ways.

    bruno wins by ko early

    or wlad wins by late stoppage .

    bruno always seemed to have a stamina problem but was a really hard puncher!!!!
     
  5. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    What did he do better? Please expand. Lets look at Bruno`s losses. Witherspoon Tyson x2 LL and Bonecrusher Smith. 2 HOF heavyweights and 2 EXCELLENT contenders. Meanwhile Vlad had 3 losses all to journeymen in devastating fashion. Bruno when hurt was like a dear caught in a cars headlights. He just froze and took his licks. He wasnt an intelligient fighter but boy he COULD take a punch. When Vlad was cracked by South African Corrie Sanders he suffered one of the most humiliating losses by any top heavy of all times. Top heavyweights dont get beaten like that.

    Bruno was an immense talent and went through his early opponents like Godzilla when through Japan. BUT he wasnt a smart fighter. When hurt he couldnt take a knee didnt know how to get on his bike or even to cover up. He just stood there and got punched into a bag. My money would still be on Bruno purely because of the era he fought in. The 90`s was the second great era of heavyweight boxers. The current crop are worst than when Mike Tyson landed on the scene in the early 80`s and that includes Vlad. Anyone remember Axel Schultz? Thats whom Vlad would have been if he was around in the Bruno LL Tyson Holyfield era. Just another able contender.
     
  6. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    Are you saying Michael Spinks wasn't a top heavyweight?

    And Bruno was slow, one-dimensional, and very unintelligent. He had great difficulty slipping a punch and couldn't fight at all off the back foot. Oh yes, and he forever suffered from terrible stamina.

    Bruno has one chance, and that's to bullrush Wlad and KO him early. If he failed (and the probability is that he would), Wlad would keep him at long range using his jab, and use his superior leverage in clinches to tire Bruno to a standstill.
     
  7. thespecialone

    thespecialone Active Member Full Member

    1,008
    0
    Mar 16, 2008
  8. Haye

    Haye Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,928
    2
    Oct 11, 2007
    Wlad and Bruno are very similair.

    Both huge, great jabs, good skills, great power in the right hand. And both have stamina issues and poor chins, its a pick em really, though I would take Bruno.
     
  9. Eubank

    Eubank Active Member Full Member

    1,264
    1
    Mar 22, 2008
    This content is protected
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,251
    Feb 15, 2006
    This is honestly a pick em fight.

    I would favour Wlad but Bruno would be the most dangerous challenge he had ever faced and would negate many of his strengths.

    If Bruno came along today he could prety much help himself to a belt.
     
  11. Sundance

    Sundance Active Member Full Member

    652
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    ]


    Mate, a pint of what you're on! I've posted at length on Bruno before but fans like you keep blowing up his record and ability to levels it never achieved. Wlad 2008 would destroy any version of Bruno. And I wouldn't trust Bruno to beat Sam Peter, Bruno's glass jaw would come into play, and I suspect a Chagaev fight would be a late stoppage win for the Uzbek man. Bruno never had the stamina for a long fight, and his chin was easy to find and brittle. Look at his record and try and find one real contender Bruno ever beat, answer is he didn't. Wlad's recent contests have been against dangerous opponents: Byrd Brock & Thompson. And he's stopped all of them. Bruno never stopped guys like these, oh sorry, Carl Williams, and a fat Joe Bugner, be serious!:hi:
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,251
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  13. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    LOL, no he would not....

    It would not matter what era he fought in (and this era is probably no worse overall than the 80s), Bruno's demons would always haunt him; mentally he lacked the tools to beat the best, be that the 80s, 90s or 00s; he physically was was arguably the finest specimen to be a contender in the history of the sport.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,251
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  15. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Bruno's lack of stamina would not be much of an issue against Wlad, because his workrate is non-existent at times.

    If Bruno could outjab Lennox Lewis he wouldn't have had any trouble with Wlad :deal

    If Wlad got the right hand going he would have a sniff, but would in turn leave himself open to being slapped into row Z by Bruno.