Frank: Burns has proven himself superior to Froch!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by BoxingAnalyst, Sep 29, 2012.


  1. 20a87

    20a87 Boxing Addict banned

    6,682
    0
    Aug 22, 2009
    Frank is just promoting his fighter. We all know froch > burns.
     
  2. 'Ben'

    'Ben' Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,307
    1
    Mar 8, 2009
    He really tarnishes his own reputation by slagging off other british fighters who are not with him, especially when what he is saying is obviously complete crap. Just comes across as being a jealous old *****.
     
  3. rossco666

    rossco666 Guest

    record wise no chance but he's defo the most teak tough in the uk outside froch. it really boggled my mind how some people thaught mitchell could bully and out tough burns. burns is on another level.
    burns has a great chance to equal froch one day tho, he's quality! i cant wait to see how he does agains the elite guy's, thats if fwank lets him off the leash and doesnt milk him in domestic fights or against ex paper champs and fringe world level guys.
     
  4. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,751
    13,328
    Mar 26, 2009
    two posts saying the same thing
     
  5. punk

    punk Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,112
    7
    May 23, 2009
    I understand he is promoting his own fighter but come on. Does anyone here actually think he really believes this himself?
     
  6. Dunky McCafferty

    Dunky McCafferty Boxing Junkie banned

    10,067
    2
    Aug 24, 2004
    Rght, we all know that right now Froch has the flashier resume that Burns, thats fine. Im not going to argue it.

    HOWEVER

    whats with all this screaming from some posters in this and the other thread about the fact a young Burns lost to Johanesson & Arthur as if its some sort of stick to beat Ricky down with???
    It was part of his learning curve, & no doubt helped the Rickster to become the fighter he is today by taking those kind of tests on. So he has 2 losses on his record, BIG DEAL.

    Too many folk here still obsessing about flashy records, & forgetting an L on your record can sometimes stand for LEARNING if you catch my drift;)

    So cut the bull**** lads, we know Fishy hasnt got much time for Froch, but dont use it an as excuse to get all tom petty about the rickster cos he lost a couple of fights:nono
     
  7. The Genius

    The Genius Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,173
    43
    Dec 16, 2011
    Froch will never be a two-weight champion.
     
  8. Bill C84

    Bill C84 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,219
    1
    Sep 11, 2011
    Neither will Ricky Burns.
     
  9. sniffmybadger

    sniffmybadger Relationships are not my forte Full Member

    9,398
    9,207
    Jan 20, 2010
    He could get cleverly's strap if he wanted it
     
  10. The Genius

    The Genius Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,173
    43
    Dec 16, 2011
    He doesn't want to that's my point. Although I think Nathan would beat him. It's a shame that Froch doesn't fancy 160. Some huge fights there.
     
  11. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Froch couldn't make 160.

    And he'd execute Cleverly. 119-109 x3.
     
  12. the inbetweener

    the inbetweener Member Full Member

    274
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
    Dumb post for someone who calls himself "the genius".
     
  13. glue glove

    glue glove Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,517
    3
    Jun 9, 2010
    Froch doesn't get given belts.
     
  14. The Genius

    The Genius Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,173
    43
    Dec 16, 2011
    Are you mad? Froch could easily make 160, it's been mentioned for years. He walks around just over 168.

    Cleverly wouldn't crumble like Bute. Nathan has got a better chance than people think.
     
  15. The Genius

    The Genius Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,173
    43
    Dec 16, 2011
    Lucian Bute was very charitable.