http://www.***********.com/frank-******-on-haye-chisora-critics-shreds-sulaiman--53023 http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...ye-v-Chisora-farce-sums-up-BBBC-problems.html by Frank ****** It seems everybodys had their say since David Haye and Dereck Chisoras grudge heavyweight showdown was announced for Saturday 14th July at West Ham United. There has been masses of column inches in both the front and back of the papers with added commentary from columnists who have never even attended a fight, yet all seem to have an expert opinion. But how many of these experts can name even two or three of the Stewards that currently sit on the British Boxing Board of Control? What I want to make perfectly clear is that Im not looking to put the British Boxing Board of Control out of business. Ive been a big supporter of the BBBofC for many years and like most of the license holders believe that we need a strong and healthy governing body to regulate the sport in Britain. What has been a concern, to many, over the last 18 months, is the stewardship of the Board concerning a number of issues that have fallen on deaf ears at their Cardiff headquarters. There are many good people working at the Board, but they are a limited company who a few years ago had to be rescued from receivership. The main problem today is how they have handled the Chisora situation. Whether you like it or not Chisora hasnt been banned he is free to box. There are also a number of other serious issues that many license holders, including myself, feel are not being dealt with concerning UK boxing. It is all very well the chosen few stewards flying around the world first class, sitting ringside, accepting fees for supervising fights or attending five day conventions all at the expense of the licence holders, licence holders who cannot even vote on important issues concerning their sport. I warned them last year that the boxing landscape was changing and that Sky Sports would be cutting back on their TV dates, which has proved to be the case and the effect that it would have on the sport. This week the Board called a secret meeting in a London hotel, with a few licensed promoters chaired by the President and Chairman of the Board Charles Giles. Neither I nor the other 40 odd licensed promoters were invited to attend. Scottish promoter Tommy Gilmour flew down from Glasgow to attend but there are about 20 South East based promoters who werent invited. Why? Meanwhile honest Jose Sulaiman of the WBC has jumped on the bandwagon supporting his Vice President Charlie Giles, yes he is the VP of the WBC. A few years ago he authorized a $10,000 donation without seeking licence holders approval to Joses organization. It was swept under the carpet without an explanation again why? Sulaiman has conveniently forgotten that he installed Mike Tyson as the number one contender in their rankings straight after being released from prison in 1995 after serving four years for ****, tried to cheat Buster Douglas out of his rightful win over Mike Tyson in Tokyo, when Antonio Margarito was banned in the USA for loading his gloves against Shane Mosley, Margarito was sanctioned by the WBC to fight in Mexico for the International Belt then went onto fight Manny Pacquiao and recently Sulaiman said that hitting women was not a major sin all in the good name of WBC sanction fees. Yesterday, the WBO and WBA organisations both confirmed that the fight will be for the their International and Intercontinental titles. The Board is affiliated with the WBO and WBA. Paco Valcarcel, president of the WBO, said, "We have to go ahead and approve the fight. The Luxembourg Boxing Federation is a member of the WBO and the problem is between the LBF and the British Boxing Board of Control, not the LBF and the WBO." Also, Alexander Povetkin will defend his WBA World Heavyweight title defence against former WBC/IBF Champion Hasim Rahman on the show. Two polls this week saw readers vote overwhelmingly in favour of watching David Haye and Dereck Chisora fight at West Ham United on Saturday 14th July. Trade newspaper Boxing News revealed that a whopping 75 per cent of its readers would watch it, while 71 per cent of the Daily Mail readers wanted to see it either by buying a ticket or watching it on BoxNation.
I've had a few chats with people about this in the past couple of weeks, and the opinion is split. Most people who follow/have an interest in boxing are ALL for it, those who don't, who are just sports fans, tend to read whatever the journos say. If they don't read The Sun, they're all against it. The WBC said this, or the BBBoC said that. One of my mates is an aspiring (that's the best word I can think of) boxing fan, once I told him about the WBC he said ''**** it, let's see it''. As a footy fan, he's used to Blatter doing lame **** to favour himself, but it's nothing compared to what Sillyman has made a living out of over the past decade in particular. I've just about convinced the rest of the lads that world titles mean **** all, but (like me I suppose) they struggle to get the head around the fact that being ''world champion'' is worthless. I mean.... if you win the 100m, you're immortal, right? Win a world title in boxing and you MIGHT be top 10 in your division. atsch
Frank will get his comeuppance? He's getting well out of his box now. He thinks he's bigger than the sport. I've no issue with Haye v Chisora but I think Frank is a rodent.