Frank Warren Appreciation Thread

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by ishy, Sep 19, 2010.


  1. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    Thats boxing. Jan and half of Feb are usually crap. People will be moaning about the same thing next year though!
     
  2. USA Rob

    USA Rob Boxing Addict banned

    5,610
    0
    Dec 22, 2012
    1. Why did you post this in this thread?
    2. You can't compare BoxNation and Sky Sports. They both serve a different purpose.
    3. Nobody is holding a gun to your head an forcing you to subscribe.
     
  3. rezzer

    rezzer Active Member Full Member

    1,211
    1,438
    Feb 11, 2009
    When Sky took all Frank ******'s fighters from ITV in 1995 it was because boxing pulled in massive viewers on Saturday nights and Sky wanted part of the action . Since then they have run the sport into the ground. I am sick of hearing how Sky have kept boxing alive - they ruined it in the first place. If boxing is bad business for Sky now it's completely their fault.
     
  4. Lilo

    Lilo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,947
    2
    Jul 6, 2010
    1. Because Frank deserves a little appreciation don't you think?
    2. Yes I can and I did. There "purpose" is to make money; they have the same purpose.
    3. I know. I don't subscribe to either.
     
  5. Bill C84

    Bill C84 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,219
    1
    Sep 11, 2011
    Walsh/Harrison= mismatch
    Ovil/Enzo = mismatch

    Frank gets no praise.
     
  6. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    2. From a selfish point of view I can defiinatly compare Sky Sports with Boxnation. I want a channel where I can watch boxing and those seem to be the 2 options.

    3. If only the anti-Boxnation fans would take those sage words on-board!;)
     
  7. Lilo

    Lilo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,947
    2
    Jul 6, 2010
    Clev/Krasniqi = 50/50?

    Still domestic COTY(SF)
     
  8. CamR21

    CamR21 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,948
    0
    May 10, 2011
    Neither are complete mismatches
     
  9. USA Rob

    USA Rob Boxing Addict banned

    5,610
    0
    Dec 22, 2012
    1. As a Boxing channel, they are providing the bare minimum required. Most of the criticism of Frank has been as a promoter as is almost entirely valid. He hasn't done one good thing as a promoter in 2013.
    2. So which will have a higher profit margin?
     
  10. Bill C84

    Bill C84 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,219
    1
    Sep 11, 2011
    I'm not sure if Clev/Dracula is 50/50 but it's not a mismatch and a better fight than Clevs previous 2 opponents.

    Its Franks coty, then again its only his second card this year, providing the fighters get paid I can accept it.
     
  11. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    1
    Apr 24, 2011
    I don't think they're are any anti-Boxnation people on this forum tbh?
     
  12. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    ie. boxing?
     
  13. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    42
    Jan 7, 2005
    Theres a few (Rampart etc) and more pop up on quiet months. Plus theres Robs, "this time its personal", sniping.
     
  14. USA Rob

    USA Rob Boxing Addict banned

    5,610
    0
    Dec 22, 2012
    2. Thats fair enough but it's not objective. As a Multi Sports channel do Sky provide enough boxing? No. As a dedicated Boxing Channel do BoxNation provide enough boxing? NO

    3. You could say the same thing to the anti Sky Sports brigade.
     
  15. USA Rob

    USA Rob Boxing Addict banned

    5,610
    0
    Dec 22, 2012
    when have i ever said "this times its personal"?