Frankie Gavin is in serious trouble

Of course he's another Jo Jo Dan.

 

gavin looked like a LWW with skinny arms

brook will ko him

 

last night i dreamt frankie won on points. i shall head nowhere near the bookies today.

 

Amazingly, all the people who said Gavin would be a world champ have all backtracked to the point that they're now *****ing about it being a mis-match.

 

i can't say i've noticed this. care to name names, or are you adhering to your usual standards of accuracy?

 

You're not one of those people. Mainly because you spend 95% of your time on here hero worshipping Froch.

 

i spend that time redressing your froch obsession. so no names, you are indeed adhering to your habitual standards of accuracy.

 

avoiding my question again. what %age of your posts do you estimate are utter bo||ocks?

 

Less than 0.1%. Now, why do you post so much about Froch?

 

so you know as much about maths as boxing. check which of us brought froch into this exchange, yet again.

and name names, instead of trying to wriggle out of your latest lie.

 

Says the guy who has started loads of Froch threads recently

 

Kerry Kayes is Frankie's nutritionist.

Lots of people on here suddenly know loads about sport and nutrition science, body type etc.

 

No I'm not 'kidding' you chump.
:twisted:

 

Anyone who's stepped into a gym and lifted weights for more than a few months will know more about nutrition and body type than Gavin. ANYONE can be 7% bodyfat, it's an irrefutable fact, some people may need to work harder to get there but it's doable, why isn't gavin (a supposed world class athlete) 7% bodyfat and fighting at 135 or lower, where he would be much more effective? The answer is that he either knows nothing about nutrition or he does know but isn't dedicated enough to follow a nutrition plan that will lower his bodyfat to the same level as kell brooks.