Because he has just an average chin, moves in straight lines, easy to hit.. Wlad is too mobile, too tall, so on ,so on I will admit, Vitali will have a MUCH easier time with Frazier though.. Vitali has a lovely shovel hook (uppercut/hook hybrid) that would bust Frazier up real bad, leading to late rounds tko. In fact,Frazier wouldnt lay to many gloves on Vitali.
That's cause Wlad fights like a giant Ukrainian ***** as he clinches on for dear life whenever his opponent gets close.
You're just another ******ed Klitschko hater. Frazier is a midget compared to the Klitschkos. 2010 Wlad would be too big, too strong, too smart, too skilled, too athletic and too powerful for the small one dimensional Frazier.
That's right, let's not talk boxing skills or styles. Let's talk about homosexual traits like, oh, he's so BIG.. OMG!!! You're gay for this guy. It's ****in up your ability to think normally. It's cuz you're a gay homosexual.
I disagree with anyone who said Wlad beat Joe!!! Sam Peter had the footspeed and punch to get to Wlad in their first fight. Wlad is SO OVERRATED ITS A JOKE! He has no chin and a **** defense. If he fighting plodding slow fighters then he finds it easy , he ****! Hes just the best of a slow ,no footspeed heavyweight division
Wow, just wow. You guys defending the Klits, nobodies calling the Klits bums because they are not, but you know zilch, nada, about boxing if you think the Klits would beat Frazier like if he was an Eddie Chambers or Samuel Peter. Frazier was never about power, he was about pressure and alot of bobbing and weaving and he was a master in it, not what Peter who was trying to be like him in his last fight with Wlad. Both Klits always, and I mean always fight from a counterpunching stance and they are both extremely resourceful with their punches, that has never changed. Why? Because neither for all the power and strength they have still don't have great stamina. Frazier did have that. Either Klit hit harder than Joe, but neither is no Foreman. Frazier never went looking for the ko, he simply wanted to get inside where that was his domain. Wlad did have an uppercut similar to Lewis's, but Wlad has never faced a fighter that bobbed and weaved and blocked punches as Frazier did. Frazier lost to 2 of the greatest HW's of all time. Wlad and Vitali didn't they lost to much, much lesser men, much smaller than themselves, they've never lost to anyone bigger and they've never fought anyone with the aggressiveness of a Frazier or Foreman. I'm not saying both Klits would of lost, but it is stupid to suggest Frazier would go down easy just because of his size when 98-99% of the men he's fought were all larger then him and his style was negate their size advantages. Watch some boxing and stop sucking ****.
Frazier wasn't good at blocking punches at all. He had the heart to take two to get inside to land his own. Wlad's power isn't far below Foreman and he is three inches taller and the best tall HW when it comes to controlling range. Frazier would be the smallest opponent of Wlad's career and he is the best of the tall HW's when it comes to controlling range, ever.
This content is protected found another way Frazier beats Wlad This content is protected now if only he could throw a left hook with these on............
I'm not so sure. I think Frazier is one the guys that Wlad would have given trouble yes he had a great left hook and he did move some and as great as he was I don't think he would have been able to get Wlad on the hook and destroy him the way a Joe Louis would have. So I'm gonna take Wlad in this one.