Frazier & Norton vs Foreman - wrong strategy?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by jaffay, Aug 19, 2009.


  1. jaffay

    jaffay New Orleans Hornets Full Member

    3,980
    18
    Jun 24, 2007
    Anybody noticed that Frazier and Norton didn't fight Foreman like they fought with other fighters in the past?

    Norton tried to box with George instead going to the ribs and slow down Foreman. Norton did it great against Ali. How would Big George handle this kind of pressure? Could Ken avoid uppercuts while in close combat and tire him?

    Frazier was passive and didn't attack like he used to do. They call him slow starter - not so true imo. His engine rolled faster as the bout progressed but that doesn't mean that he was slow starter. He was just waiting for punishment. What if he worked Foremans body from the start? Was it wrong strategy or Frazier was in decline and not so dynamic like with his greatest rival Ali?

    Could Frazier and Norton had their chances against Foreman if they fought in another way?
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  2. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    Norton most definitely did not try and box George. he engaged him early, hence why he got bombed out. He tried sharpshooting George the same way he did Ali and got caught by a much bigger puncher than he who forced him back and destroyed him. Norton for me performs better against boxers, less well against 'punchers'.

    Frazier's style is all wrong against Foreman, he isn't going to box him on the backfoot and by means of his height and style he is cannon fodder for Foreman; in perfect range for his low-slung uppercuts and hooks.

    IN MY OPINION :good
     
    Toney F*** U likes this.
  3. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    83
    May 30, 2009
    Guy above me is wrong. Norton backpedalled and tried out-boxing him. It was the right strategy but the wrong strategy for his style. Norton doesn't fight on the backpeddle well. If he went right at George he might've gotten knocked out earlier. His chin won't hold. Frazier fought his fight he just got bombed out of there and couldn't recover. Watch Frazier I and II against Foreman and tell me he didn't go after him. Foreman was just pushing him off and Frazier wasn't in the best condition.
     
    swagdelfadeel and wubbie like this.
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    On a further viewing I've realised why I was wrong. Norton was originally caught with his back to the ropes.

    It was after recently re-watching 'Champions Forever' when Norton said that he wanted to go straight at Foreman that altered my perception. And I'm one of thew admitted Foreman devotees on here :lol:

    Agree with your thoughts on the Frazier fight as they are similar to mine:good
     
  5. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    83
    May 30, 2009
    But didn't Norton also say on Champions Forever that "I tried to box him, and get him in the later rounds to tire him out. But it never got that far." Either way, it's all good our minds slip for the moment here and there.

    And then Foreman was like. "I was scared of Ken Norton" :lol:
     
  6. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    When George unleashed his jab on Norton, he hit Ken in the heart and drove him backwards.

    George thought he was invincible and played the part.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,718
    29,051
    Jun 2, 2006
    no.
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    Yeah probably that, look bud I smoke a lot and ain't that smart anyways, my brain is fried :lol:

    George continually says how he was terrified of everyone. Seems very humble in this. But yeah, he was apparently very scared of Norton, hence why he wanted to get rid of him early. Says the same of Frazier but it might just be false modesty.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  9. round15

    round15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,370
    45
    Nov 27, 2007
    Both of Eddie Futch's men weren't the greatest defensively.

    Norton preferred to use the cross-arm technique and I always questioned his actual approach overall to fighting. Kenny seemed to follow in the vein of counterpuncher, but he didn't move his head enough or throw enough hooks to the body off of jabs to be considered a counterpuncher. As for Frazier, I've discussed his fights with Foreman in previous threads and my viewpoint doesn't change. Foreman fought Frazier when Joe was far from his prime shape. Again, I won't say that Frazier would beat Foreman, but certainly could have put forth a much better perfomance had if he treated George with the same respect to training and conditioning that he paid Ali. George wouldn't have KO'ed the FOTC version of Frazier inside two rounds. Prime Joe would have made Foreman miss a lot more punches, and he would have attacked George off the angles when he was pressured himself, just like he did to Chuvalo.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,567
    Nov 24, 2005
    Wrong strategy ?

    Yes, I'd say.
     
  11. Hydraulix

    Hydraulix Left Hook From Hell.. Full Member

    1,767
    23
    Oct 4, 2008
    Frazier did much better against Foreman in their second fight. But the only way for Smokin Joe to be effective is to get inside and land those power shots. And to do that, he is right within reach to get struck by Big George. Trying to fight George from the distance enabled Joe to survive a lot longer in the second fight, but there's no way Joe can hurt you from the outside.

    Having said that, I'd give Dempsey the best chance against Foreman. He'd get knocked out eventually, but Jack would patiently wait for an opening to attack, ala Jess Willard. Marciano, Frazier, Tyson and Tua go right at you.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  12. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,650
    13,047
    Apr 1, 2007
    And he did better in the second fight when he was in terrible physical condition, the guy had friggin contacts in during that fight I believe.

    First fight, well, lot of factors there.

    Wrong strategy, living the high life leading up to the fight and not training enough, arrogance.

    He without doubt is partly responsible for the slaughter that we got.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  13. yancey

    yancey Active Member Full Member

    1,487
    54
    Nov 28, 2007
    Your thoughts on what Frazier needed to do against Foreman in order to be effective are exactly right. He has to get inside Foreman's punching radius, lay on the man's chest, and work the body.

    However, the third man in the ring in Jamaica let Foreman get away with push-offs and wrestling moves in order to keep Frazier off of him. Plus, that was definitely not the real prime Joe Frazier in the ring that night.

    Prime 205 pound Frazier of 1968-1970 definitely has a viable, fighting chance against Foreman, despite the bad matchups of style. I wouldn't bet on the outcome, I'm just saying prime Frazier with quicker movement and a hungry attitude is in with a better chance than many give him.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  14. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    83
    May 30, 2009
    I would bet 1000 dollars on 73 Foreman against prime Frazier. If that's a fight you wouldn't bet on then you should never beat on any fight basically. Frazier is tailor made for Foreman. If anyone thinks Frazier chances against Foreman in his physical prime get underrated they are crazy. Frazier basically has to keep Foreman from not landing a bomb all night. He can't take his power and he was to wear and break Foreman down. His chances are long. Saying people underrate his chances is like me saying people underrated what Marciano could do against Foreman. It's just untrue but some people like to hold that high position on their favorite fighter.

    The whole Frazier was past it is overstated. 2-3 years of his prime and 2 years and a few fights after his ATG FOTC performances. Frazier obviously was living the high life but he was still in his 20's and not that foregone. He got destroyed by Foreman. Frazier in his prime does better but obviously loses. The only thing is he gets destroyed less. It might go 3-4 rounds... maybe 5. If he develops a similar game plan to fight 2 he can last even longer. But he won't win that way just survive.
     
  15. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,455
    Jan 6, 2007
    Frazier was honest after both fights.

    He credited the "New Champ" after Fight One, and said "George hits a ton" after
    Fight Two.

    I always have had respect for Joe.