Are you ******ed? Your logic is that Garcia = World champ, Roach = Not a world champ, therefore Garcia > Roach. Simpleton logic. Then another poster mentions that Roach fought much better fighters, and you shoot that down with "he lost". I mean are you just ******ed? I applied the exact same logic for Shavers, and suddenly you're now backtracking and going against your logic of world champ vs not a world champ and now actually talking into account competition?
As opposed to Roach who was also stopped 3 times--and by fighters with no punch.atsch and Roach didn't have the power to punch his way out of a wet paperbag. The 'tards in this place
I asked this question to test how dumb you all were. Robert Garcia was a world class boxer. Freddie Roach was a Friday Night Fights brawler.
Shutup idiot. My logic is that Garcia>Roach because he is. The fact that he was a world champ and Freddie never even got close to being one is just one reason. And yes, Freddy did lose... 13 times to be exact, and had only 15 KOs in 53 fights. Freddy was a featherfisted journeyman and Robert would kick his ass just like those other 13 guys did. :deal