Freddie Steele or Jack Dempsey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, May 5, 2016.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,582
    46,198
    Feb 11, 2005
    Who has a better argument as to being the greatest fighter in the history of their respective division?

    Why? Because your threads all suck.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'll go for Jack but I would imagine Freddie will have his supporters.
     
  3. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,582
    46,198
    Feb 11, 2005
    Can you at least offer a reason why? Depth of resume certainly goes to Steele.
     
  4. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    Which Dempsey the MW or HW?
     
  5. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,582
    46,198
    Feb 11, 2005
    Well played. Technically, the "respective divisions" mention would disqualify the Non Pariel by the insistence of multiple divisions and Freddie being a noted middle without a namesake in another division.
     
  6. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    Ok
     
  7. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    787
    Aug 17, 2015
    Steele, although there isn't a case to be made for either of them IMO.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    I pick Dempsey because I think he is top 5 at heavyweight whereas Steele just gets in my top ten at middle,and I think the divisions are comparable for quality.
     
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,582
    46,198
    Feb 11, 2005
    Rarely do I disagree with you so.

    Dempsey doesn't even make the Top Ten in the heavyweight division. Steele has a good argument for #3.

    And the middleweight division is one of the two best in the sport's history while the heavyweight division is definitively the second worst.
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    I'd rate Steele just below Apostoli at middleweight, and I'm not sure Apostoli is quite top 10.
    Dempsey would almost certainly make my top 10 at heavyweight, but I guess that position is entirely disputable too.

    To be fair, the MW division is far more stacked historically.
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,582
    46,198
    Feb 11, 2005
    ...
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    Rarely do we agree, and almost never about William Harrison Dempsey.
     
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,582
    46,198
    Feb 11, 2005
    I think we agree more often than not, only that Kid Blackie is more often a subject in these parts than not.

    I was trying to link a middleweight ranking done on another website but apparently that is verboten. Google boxing+scene greatest middleweights. It's a ranking I endorse. Steele at #5.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,731
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    A few years ago Steele would not have been on my radar now ,thanks to Classic I have learned a bit about him.
    He looks explosive on film, fast ,elusive ,unpredictable, and explosive!
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,236
    Feb 15, 2006
    For whatever it is worth, people would not have thought Steele worthy to clean Dempsey’s spit bucket, while he was actually active.

    If Jack Dempsey walked into the room back then, it was like Muhammad Ali walking into the room today.