Froch beat Taylor because he's more skilled.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BITCH ASS, Apr 28, 2009.


  1. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Yes, it's true that Froch has no rhythmm, but he is better skilled than Taylor.

    If anyone disagrees, I would like them to put reasons why.

    Keep in mind, speed and power is not a skill.
     
  2. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    No,he beat him because he has a iron determination and a steel chin with a better stamina.
    Taylor was 14 seconds away from winning.
     
  3. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    So you think Taylor is more skilled?

    If so, why?
     
  4. Arriba

    Arriba Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,148
    5
    Jun 30, 2007
    Bingo. Froch one because he had all the intangibles and he truly wanted to be champion more than Jermain did.
     
  5. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    I disagree he beat him because he was better conditoned !!

    There was nothing that I saw from Froch that said he was more skilled than than Taylor ..Both fighters had equal pop but Froch's defense is horrendous !!

    He really needs some fine tuning ..I will give him props on his counter punching though I was impressed with his counter punching ..
     
  6. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    So you think Taylor lacked heart?
     
  7. rccwilliams

    rccwilliams Sippin' on some sizzurp Full Member

    2,549
    0
    Mar 5, 2009
    Taylor is more skillful. I dont need to explain it becuase your post makes no attempt at explaining why you think Froch is more skillful, when its pretty obvious he is not.
     
  8. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    You think Taylor has better defense?
     
  9. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    I don't need to explain why because I already know.

    I just want someone to prove me wrong.

    Perhaps, someone like you....
     
  10. Arriba

    Arriba Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,148
    5
    Jun 30, 2007
    No. Froch just had more of it.

    Froch fought the last 3 rounds like he wouldn't be denied. Not many fighters can overcome that.
     
  11. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    Compared to Froch I say yes ..Froch was too easily hit imo ..
     
  12. DStew

    DStew Active Member Full Member

    1,146
    0
    Nov 7, 2008
    If you're going to make a statement like "Froch is more skilled than Taylor", it's you who needs to support it with reasoning.
     
  13. DStew

    DStew Active Member Full Member

    1,146
    0
    Nov 7, 2008
    Well everyone else knows why Taylor is more skilled, so why the need to explain it to you?
     
  14. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    You're probably right, but I wanna give everyone else a shot first.
     
  15. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Yes he is,that doesn't mean he is the better fighter.
    Taylor also has a problem fighting bigger guys because being HBO's hype boy he didn't fight real MW's before and after winning the title.
    Funny that HBO had him listed at 6'1 and Showtime at 5'11.
    He is more skilled,he can put punches together,he uses the jab a lot better,he sees more openings,he has better footwork only when he usesi it thought,etc.