Froch beat Taylor because he's more skilled.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BITCH ASS, Apr 28, 2009.


  1. martin0792

    martin0792 The Golden Boy Full Member

    1,260
    0
    Jul 3, 2008
    Taylor was outclassing Froch, he had the better Boxing ability. Carl Froch's hunger, heart and determination pulled him through the fight and thats what true fighters are all about, look at the shots he walked through, true true warrior.
     
  2. KingGheedora

    KingGheedora Member Full Member

    314
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    You said that CF was a better counter puncher, were you watching the same fight as everyone else? Taylor counter punched Froch the whole night, that's why he was constantly nailing Froch with stiff jabs when Froch would try to come in. Froch himself admits that Taylor was beating him on counterpunches. That is one example of Taylor's skill superiority. Here is a quote from Froch himself about the counterpunching:

    (from here)

    Second, it's pretty much universally agreed that Taylor out-boxed Froch, and would have won had he not been knocked out in the 12th. The fact that Froch NEEDED TO KNOCK OUT TAYLOR TO WIN is proof that Taylor was winning the fight, and was the more skilled fighter. If Froch was more skilled, he'd have been ahead on the cards and would not have needed to pull out a miraculous 12th round KO in order to win. Again, here is a quote directly from Carl Froch admitting this:
    Virtually anyone who knows about boxing agrees that Taylor was out-boxing Froch, and that he would have won. The commentators, including Lennox Lewis, two of the judges (and the third judge, who did have Froch ahead, every article and commentator has reffered to his scoring as being ridiculous), and every sports reporter who has covered the fight agrees with this. Everyone in this thread agrees with this. You are the only one who is not agreeing, and so far you have only made ridiculous arguments in support of your claim.

    Taylor apparently has a reputation for being bad at finishing his opponents. That is probably one skill he lacks, but i will attribute his failure to finish Froch after he knocked him down in the 3rd to two things, one, he lost the first Pavlik fight because he spent too much energy trying to finish Pavlik off, so I think he was reluctant to make the same mistake. That's why he didn't go in for the kill. He was hesitant. The KO loss to Pavlik has damaged his confidence and he may never be the same fighter again, always being hesitant.

    Froch has no skill and as soon as he goes up against a complete fighter he will lose. He leaves his hands down all the time and doesn't have the speed to pull that style off.
     
  3. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    5
    Mar 14, 2007
    Nobody can "prove" that anyone is more skillful than anyone else. You're taking the minority position here. Burden's on you to convince the majority.

    The real short argument - Taylor has better footwork, Taylor throws straighter punches, Taylor has a more varied punch selection, Taylor has much better defense, Taylor is more accurate, Taylor has better head movement, Froch has better body movement and a more awkward style. When Taylor wasn't tired, the skill difference was apparent. When Taylor got tired, Froch was able to take advantage, because Taylor's brain forgets to use those skills when he's not at 100%. I can't think of too many areas where Froch is more skilled than Taylor.
     
  4. ThaWiseJester

    ThaWiseJester Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,401
    1
    Mar 28, 2009
    Froch has better skill? Not to sure about that,he does have better conditioning,it wasnt until Taylor got tired that Froch started landing clean punches,after Taylor didnt have his guard up like he did most the fight... Taylor is not the best finisher though,Froch had that attribute more than Taylor..
     
  5. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    Axe man has been owned on this thread!! Ive never seen a poster get owned so much in their own threads..damn shame!
     
  6. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    Ya -- and he was 1 point down and even on the rounds. Froch was getting his ears boxed off.
     
  7. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    And yet another damn fine post from Brickhaus:deal
     
  8. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Yeah, Taylor's downfall is his stamina.

    That's exactly why he didn't get tired vs BHOP, Ouma and Spinks among others.

    Oh but...........he uhhhh in that fight he uhhhhhhhhh.......you know......uhhhhh trained harder.....uhhhh.

    Yeah.....

    Fact is Taylor can't deal with pressure, and not only that, it appears now that he can't deal with a counterpuncher that has a hard punch.

    Basically Taylor can beat small men up with no problem, but when it comes to anybody that has a size advantage or is roughly the same size but applies pressure, he folds like a lawn chair, yet the man is greatly skilled.

    But maybe someone can explain why stamina wasn't a problem in those other fights......but they can't.

    So again with the same argument that boils down to Taylor's athleticism.

    I already said that Taylor throws sharper and more compact punches, and his reflexes in combination with his athletic ability allows him to get out of the way of punches....

    BUT....

    His inability to think clearly in the ring when he's pressured, combined with his unnecessary, figity movement in the ring, along with his inability to set fighters up make him a guy that lacks the ability to box.

    Therefore, he has limited skill.

    This will be proven again and again if he fights the elite opposition at 168. Because unlike guys who have real skill such as Archie Moore for instance who fought guys 30 and 40 lbs heavier, Taylor will always be beaten by size and pressure.

    How you think that equates to skill.......I don't know.......I haven't heard anyone describe that yet.

    They just make basic assumptions about his defense which isn't very good in the first place as he relies mostly on his athleticism and size or other factors that again relate to his athleticism and size.
     
  9. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Three of the biggest differences are in the ability to finish a fighter, survival skills, and pacing over a 12 round fight. When you throw out things like "when Taylor wasn't tired", you're cutting down the picture of the whole fight as it happened into the neat little chunk where Taylor was doing well and ignoring that it was Taylor's lack of skills in those areas that helped allow Froch to win the fight.

    Most of what else you said, I agree with- in the sense of "gym skills", Taylor's got the edge. It seems more that I have a broader definition of what overall "skill" is than anything else. :thumbsup
     
  10. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    I'm not questioning Taylors skills,but id like to throw a spanner in the works.If Taylor was the more skilfull of the two WHY did he fight the way he did ? numerous boxing writers said Froch would probably lose the first third of the fight and get stronger towards the end,possibly even stopping Taylor by KO or TKO why didn't Taylor read the script and adjust his fight plan ? Taylor has good "textbook" boxing skills,but is very amatuerish mentally,he knows his stamina is questionable so why did he force the action at the start of the fight knowing he would probably gas out in the later rounds ? Why couldn't he use his skills to pace himself ? why couldn't he use his skill to win the fight and conserve energy ?
     
  11. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Hey got tired and his stamina was always an issue. In almost all of his higher profile fights Taylor ended up slowing after the 6th round. JT starts off well but fades. That is fact.