Froch beat Taylor because he's more skilled.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BITCH ASS, Apr 28, 2009.


  1. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Basically, Rudyard I can tell you everything Taylor did right and wrong and everything Froch did right and wrong actually, without having to speculate on issues like "stamina" or "mental well being" or some kinda gay **** that only you would know about.

    I can tell you right now, but the thing is, I'm not.....
     
  2. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    If he was controlling the pace of the fight, how come he ended up completely gassing?

    He obviously didn't control it that well.
     
  3. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    I don't think Taylor was controlling the pace of the fight at all. In fact if people want to believe stamina was an issue, you would have to say Taylor is terrible at controlling pace which he is.

    Yes though, I would say that Taylor is the more accurate fighter, but that's only one skill, and if used incorrectly is quite meaningless. In Taylor's case I would say that his accuracy has a lot to do with his natural reflexes and athleticism as well.
     
  4. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009


    :patsch You're one dumbass dude...Its pretty ****ing obvious Taylor was winning the exchanges(while winning rounds) and was getting the best of Froch before Taylor went into a shell and didnt work as he did in previous rounds...You keep on overlooking that part...You're the only pathetic ******* to even questions Taylor's skills!
     
  5. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    The only thing Taylor did wrong in that fight was not preparing himself to go into the final rounds...He didnt properly pace himself so he gassed...PERIOD! So what ever you want to and if you're not going to say it..shut the **** up then...No one cares what you got to say funboy!
     
  6. David UK

    David UK Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    Feb 6, 2007
    I'm Froch's biggest fan but even I wouldn't say he's more skillful than Taylor, but it takes more than just skill to win a fight.
     
  7. TheUnstoppable

    TheUnstoppable Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,328
    1
    Jul 14, 2008
    His accuracy was being used perfectly, as I said before Froch looked clumpsy, helpless and baffled in there while Taylor was pumping that jab or his.

    Taylors timing was far better, as was his counterpunching.

    His defence was superior.

    His shot choice was clearly better (Froch leaping in with an uppercut from 8 feet away, wtf?!).

    Obviously his speed was clearly better than Froch's too.
     
  8. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    I think you need to tell that peice of **** Axeman once again since he cant seem to understand that.
     
  9. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    So he was winning the exchanges, had more speed, had more power, had more experience, was the better athlete, and according to you had more skills, yet he still lost the fight?

    I guess that makes sense.

    So why didn't Taylor capitalize when he had Froch hurt?

    Did have something to do with Froch or was it some kind of "gay mental disorder" or some **** that you're going to assume?

    I mean, you're the damn genius. Just explain.

    Oh wait.....oh...it was because Taylor was afraid of being countered.

    But counterpunching.......that ain't a skill....
     
  10. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Taylor's counterpunching was not better. I mean, now you gotta go ahead and throw that in.

    From what I saw, Taylor was the guy that was hesitant to throw, not Froch.

    So why don't you explain to me how Taylor's counterpunching was more effective or did you just throw that **** out?

    Oh, yeah, you did....
     
  11. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Man I'm done with you...If you dont understand my points then there is no need to even debate with a piece of **** like you!:hi:
     
  12. TheUnstoppable

    TheUnstoppable Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,328
    1
    Jul 14, 2008
    1. yes, he lost the fight, as many of us have already explained in long drawn out detail. Yet you dont seem to get it.

    2. he didnt capitalise cause he never does, he's probably the worst finisher in the sport.

    3. yes, counterpunching is a skill. A skill that Taylor is far superior at in comparison to Froch.
     
  13. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    That dumbass guy you're trying to talk to is a little slow as you can see! You, I and several others have presented valid points to the topic and he still doesnt want to accept it!
     
  14. P.4.P.G.O.A.T.

    P.4.P.G.O.A.T. Q Boro Killa Bee Full Member

    3,259
    4
    Oct 10, 2007
    Better jab, better footwork, faster hands = more skilled. Very simple.
     
  15. TheUnstoppable

    TheUnstoppable Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,328
    1
    Jul 14, 2008
    I dont get it, its just baffling how none of it is making any impact! :lol: