Froch: "Bute is out of the equation, really"

i dont see your comparison here why are we bringing up Leonard and Hearns?

If we are going on the subject of that fight I was not impressed with Leonard in the bout was a 12 rounder he would have lost 117 to 111 or 116 to 112 he didnt really do much til the 7th or 8th then took a break and didnt really turn it on til the 13th, i mean i guess it says a lot that he could quickly get his **** together and KO a guy who he didnt break down for most of the fight and that wasnt totally out of gas

 

I should have made it clearer I was referring to Leonard-Hearns against the paragraph about Froch so hands up on my part.I meant that you agreed with everything said and emboldened a paragraph which referred to Froch being behind against Taylor before catching up.I was trying to make the point that because someone comes from behind to win,it should not be a basis for evaluating their ability.The post you were agreeing with made several points I disagreed with,but I was just trying to gauge what part of the aforementioned paragraph you particularly agreed with,making particular reference to the part about Froch.

 

Yup.

Bute would flat out beat the **** out of Froch. As for Kessler and Ward, Bute outpoints the former (Kessler) and is a 50/50 vs the latter (Ward).

 

?

Prediction fail

 

yup.


wins the bailey topsy turvy post award.