Froch: "Bute is out of the equation, really"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by drozzy, Nov 16, 2011.


  1. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,107
    5,636
    Oct 5, 2009
    i dont see your comparison here why are we bringing up Leonard and Hearns?

    If we are going on the subject of that fight I was not impressed with Leonard in the bout was a 12 rounder he would have lost 117 to 111 or 116 to 112 he didnt really do much til the 7th or 8th then took a break and didnt really turn it on til the 13th, i mean i guess it says a lot that he could quickly get his **** together and KO a guy who he didnt break down for most of the fight and that wasnt totally out of gas
     
  2. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    I should have made it clearer I was referring to Leonard-Hearns against the paragraph about Froch so hands up on my part.I meant that you agreed with everything said and emboldened a paragraph which referred to Froch being behind against Taylor before catching up.I was trying to make the point that because someone comes from behind to win,it should not be a basis for evaluating their ability.The post you were agreeing with made several points I disagreed with,but I was just trying to gauge what part of the aforementioned paragraph you particularly agreed with,making particular reference to the part about Froch.
     
  3. hoopsman

    hoopsman Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,520
    2,144
    Jul 24, 2005
    Yup.

    Bute would flat out beat the **** out of Froch. As for Kessler and Ward, Bute outpoints the former (Kessler) and is a 50/50 vs the latter (Ward).
     
  4. Ctrl_Alt_Defeat

    Ctrl_Alt_Defeat CtrlAltDefeat Full Member

    297
    0
    Aug 11, 2013
  5. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,027
    Sep 22, 2010
    yup.


    wins the bailey topsy turvy post award.