Froch: "Dirrell is a weasel!"

Maybe they should learn from Hopkins and Ward, who somehow take illegal and dirty and rename it Crafty?

 

:rofl


Did you actually watch your own boy's last fight?

 

At 1:55 of the vid I posted above. Froch holds Dirrells head down with his off hand, and literally sizes up the back of Dirrells head, and punches it. :rofl



Any Brits got an excuse for this?


If Froch had broke a beer bottle and shanked Dirrell in the ring, and Dirrell died, would he have won a UD in your eyes?

 

clyde, who have you got in a rematch (preferably AWAY from Europe): a more experienced Dirrell or Froch?

 

Nothing to do with Froch holding is head down and hitting hit with his other hand?



Honestly children. :nut

 

I say Froch by KO in a rematch because Dirrell hasnt got the luck to survive another 12 rounds !

 

I had it 114-113 for

This content is protected

, but that doesn't mean I don't know why he didn't get the nod... Dirrell made it into a stinker and refused to fight! Although I scored it for André, I didn't think one second he deserved it!

And why should anybody make a video of the Froch highlights or the Dirrell lows of this match? There's nothing to prove, because he got the W!
If Froch lost that bout, there would be vids of it on YT, and not, or hardly from Dirrell!

 

That's bizarre.....I was just thinking about that exact scenario when I read your post.

If Dirrell could un-learn a lot of the spoiling stuff that comes automatically to him in the ring, then I'd be a huge fan. The guy has some sweet skills.

A re-match would likely be another horrible styles clash and unless Froch could drag him into the trenches I think Dirrell gets the decision. But, as will likely always be the case with Dirrell, much would depend on the attitude of the ref/judges in his fights.

 

I actually directed the question to clyde. (Jusging from your answer) you're British I presume?

 

I agree.

 

I wish Froch would shut the **** up about Dirrell.

He rants on about how he wouldnt stand in front of him and play him at his own game after escaping with a controversial SD, then he has the audacity to keep going on about it.

Something about that encounter and/or Dirrell in general really pisses Froch off, i think he knows he got lucky that night and that Dirrell would win a rematch.

 

I am but i was kidding trying to mirrow MW 100% biased view. In reality i see it going similiar to the first fight. Dirrell will be carefull and spoil the fight and Froch will be unable to find an answer to it, leaving it up to the judges and refs. Then it will all depend on if they prefer cleaner punches or agression. If agression Froch will win and if cleaner punches Dirrell will win. One key fact many seem to overlook is fact Dirrell didnt really have much choice in how to approach the fight because of Frochs awkward style going toe to toe or trading creates too big a risk of being caught unluckily.

 

Haye v Ruiz.....mexican ref

 

I think Froch wants him again so he cant spank the glass jawed weasel.

 

..then why is Haye so keen in having his remaining fights in Manchester "the Mecca of Boxing" Arena :roll: