Froch - dirrell round by round

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BADINTENTIONS2, Oct 17, 2009.

Page 41 of 41
  1. o_money

    o_money Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,894
    Likes Received:
    1
    100% agree he would have knocked Froch out.
     
    o_money, Oct 17, 2009
    #601
  2. thejokerswild

    thejokerswild Guest

    about sums it. it was there for him to take, but being too careful can make you lose fights. great example.
     
    thejokerswild, Oct 17, 2009
    #602
  3. Jab_hard

    Jab_hard Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2009
    Messages:
    964
    Likes Received:
    0
    My words after 4 rounds.
     
    Jab_hard, Oct 18, 2009
    #603
  4. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Messages:
    5,897
    Likes Received:
    807
    The problem was the ref let the brit foul away with no penalty
     
    BUDW, Oct 18, 2009
    #604
  5. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Messages:
    32,127
    Likes Received:
    41
    Woeful scoring.
     
    TommyV, Oct 18, 2009
    #605
  6. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    12,827
    Likes Received:
    3
    Good call. It took me until about the 6th.
     
    BlueApollo, Oct 18, 2009
    #606
  7. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    22,296
    Likes Received:
    5
    I think the 8th was a pick em as well. Dirrell put on a clinic most of that round, but Froch caught him at the end and seemed to wobble his legs.

    I can legitimately see a 114-113 Froch scorecard, but anything wider than that for Froch is crazy. The crowd must have really had a lot of infuence, considering how press row scored the fight as well.

    Is it a robbery? Probably not, but it's a damn questionable decision.
     
    Brickhaus, Oct 18, 2009
    #607
Page 41 of 41