Froch - dirrell round by round

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BADINTENTIONS2, Oct 17, 2009.


Page 41 of 41
  1. o_money

    o_money Boxing Junkie banned

    11,894
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    100% agree he would have knocked Froch out.
     
    o_money, Oct 17, 2009
    o_money, Oct 17, 2009
    #601
  2. thejokerswild

    thejokerswild Guest

    about sums it. it was there for him to take, but being too careful can make you lose fights. great example.
     
    thejokerswild, Oct 17, 2009
    thejokerswild, Oct 17, 2009
    #602
  3. Jab_hard

    Jab_hard Active Member Full Member

    964
    0
    Jul 18, 2009
    My words after 4 rounds.
     
    Jab_hard, Oct 18, 2009
    Jab_hard, Oct 18, 2009
    #603
  4. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,957
    853
    Nov 23, 2007
    The problem was the ref let the brit foul away with no penalty
     
    BUDW, Oct 18, 2009
    BUDW, Oct 18, 2009
    #604
  5. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    Woeful scoring.
     
    TommyV, Oct 18, 2009
    TommyV, Oct 18, 2009
    #605
  6. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    Good call. It took me until about the 6th.
     
    BlueApollo, Oct 18, 2009
    BlueApollo, Oct 18, 2009
    #606
  7. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    6
    Mar 14, 2007
    I think the 8th was a pick em as well. Dirrell put on a clinic most of that round, but Froch caught him at the end and seemed to wobble his legs.

    I can legitimately see a 114-113 Froch scorecard, but anything wider than that for Froch is crazy. The crowd must have really had a lot of infuence, considering how press row scored the fight as well.

    Is it a robbery? Probably not, but it's a damn questionable decision.
     
    Brickhaus, Oct 18, 2009
    Brickhaus, Oct 18, 2009
    #607
Page 41 of 41