Froch forced to fight mandatory challenger before Bute to keep IBF title?

The odds sucks. Low profit, not worth the risk. And I don't have time for any kind of betting anymore like when I was in college and high-school.

 

I suspect you know that I meant for neutral fans DB.That could probably sell twice over for The Bell Centre.

And I know people might look at Two Shakes' post and think it's venemous,but he actually makes some very valid points.
And given that you were one of those who came on and took his medicine like a man,I'd leave it for some of the others to chew on.:stir

 

This content is protected

atsch

 

Who cares? What the **** did he ever do to deserve a shot? Oh wow he showed heart and took a beating he should have gotten a title shot a long time ago.atsch

**** these belts the IBF and Stevenson can wait.

 

Why does he deserev a shot? WHo has he beat? Don George? atsch

 

Froch will re-match Bute, then fight either Kessler or Ward, and be done.

All these Bute fans bitching about how he 'DESERVES' this re-match are ****ing twisted. He doesn't deserve one, and if the re-match clause wasn't in the contract Froch wouldn't be giving him one he'd be going straight after Kessler and Ward.

Froch (BRUTALLY) bangs out Bute in 5 rounds and people have the cheek to call this fight meaningful? Jokers. IF Carl takes this fight he is just tying up the last loose end before going for the fights he really wants.

 

Well he's fighting for the NABF LHW title so you call it whatever you want, but last I checked anything over the 168 pound limit is technically light-heavyweight domain.

 

Getting the mandatory spot is supposed to mean something.He was certainly no less deserving of a shot than Morales,who he was passed over for.If you're saying a mandatory doesn't deserve a shot,what the **** is the point of a body having a #1 challenger then?