Froch: "I don't really feel I lost to Ward"

Should have included Froch in that thread with Kahn & Donaire lol.

 

:deal

 

Loophole? guess he was confused, thought Ward was going to do his taxes that night and Ward beat him the **** up instead.

cocaine is one hell of a drug

 

he might have won 2 rounds against Ward. I like Froch but he is Delusional.

 

Surely he didn't say that!?!?

Source?

 

Well.. Source?

 

:deal

 

Apparently not wading forward and throwing haymakers is "finding loopholes in the sport"

 

Seems people on here love to throw the word 'schooling' around on here. Fights in which someone ran or pot shot with a very low output of punches is called a 'schooling' on here by some posters :roflatsch

A 'schooling' is what Calzaghe did to Lacy where you actually throw punches and engage and not get hit in return. Running around throwing one punch at a time landing 11 punches a round while circling your opponent is NOT a 'schooling'

 

loopholes=great inside work.something british boxerts really lack.People say ricky Hatton was a great inside fighter but he wasn't ,floyd proved that ,and he admitted it"he's very tricky on the inside"

 

it kind of is though.hit and dont get hit.

 

When did he say that?

 

This is the kind of thing Froch would say though.

People seem to overlook the fact that he is OUTSTANDINGLY arrogant

 

Maybe he means in boxing resumes? Because he clearly has the superior work.

 

Just about anyone can do that with a low punch out put. I am not saying you have to throw 100 punches a round.

Sorry, but running (that isn't using footwork people but that is a whole nother topic) circling, throwing one punch at a time and not engaging is NOT schooling someone. There is no risk in that. What does it prove?

Actually throwing a wide array of punches in volume while engaging and using your skills to avoid getting hit in return is 'schooling' someone.