Let me complete the sentence... Froch is the perfect fighter for being knocked out by Arthur Abraham.
Haye. Three shots in a row, all undeserved??????? I can see the argument for the Wlad fight being underserved, but what are the other two?
It sounds like you're describing the perfect fighter's mentality. Subtract the hubris and yeah, Carl may have that (though I suppose the need for any subtractions sort of impedes the notion of perfection, doesn't it? ) As a fighter he is far from perfect. In fact, he embodies imperfection.
Miranda has the gift of gab? Miranda had a belt to defend? Miranda was willing to travel to Denmark to fight Kessler?
Yes. Yes. NABO belt. Looks like this: http://www.memphisboxing.com/images/whitfield_NABO_belt_7690.jpg Yes.
Froch is annoying as hell with his dumb quotes.And I dont like his fighting style...too sloppy.So to me he is very far from being the perfect fighter.
Froch isnt the perfect fighter, but he is a breath of fresh air no doubt. The fact he lacks skills of his peers is not a bad thing for me, in my eyes it is the best thing to say about him, he isnt as skillfull but still wins big fights. He beat a future light heavy champ and very good young fighter in Pascal, practically finished Taylor in many people's eyes despite having been behind and came through a very awkaward fight against Dirrel, who i think is a future champ also. All of these were high risk fights, but he took them nonetheless and is definately one of my favourite fighters at the moment. Doubt hel beat Kessler though.
Froch is definitely a credit to the sport...his fights are always entertaining... Speaks volumes about Dirrell!!