Froch limited?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Proud Warrior, Apr 26, 2009.


  1. Proud Warrior

    Proud Warrior Well-Known Member banned

    1,598
    1
    Nov 28, 2005
    He may be limited but take a look at the last round again. He needed a KO and could of easily panicked and smothered his work, he stood off and picked his shots,that shows a great boxing brain. He was so cool it was untrue. You train to fight 12X3 min rounds and thats wot he did. Credit needs to be given.
     
  2. ApatheticLeader

    ApatheticLeader is bringing ***y back. Full Member

    10,798
    3
    Jul 20, 2004
    He showed good composure, and he is a good fighter. He deserves credit for ithe victory, even though it's clear that Taylor is probably the better fighter.
     
  3. Proud Warrior

    Proud Warrior Well-Known Member banned

    1,598
    1
    Nov 28, 2005
    This is the one thing that bothers me on this site,styles make fights. Some like tip tap others like bangers,i like to watch both but when styles meet it makes for the better fights.
     
  4. outthebox

    outthebox Member Full Member

    399
    10
    Apr 19, 2009
    what makes me laugh is if that was in the 4th round we'd hear how froch is the next big thing etc blah blah blah. but because it was at the death when he was behind hes not getting the credit he deserves. Either way same outcome.

    im not even a big froch fan either.
     
  5. scilent assasin

    scilent assasin p4p Full Member

    1,016
    2
    Apr 25, 2009
    towards the end when taylor was hurt, froch was so calm it was unbelievable his hands were down and was slipping taylors jabs that he was throwing to defend himself and selected his shots very nicely i was impressed
     
  6. Williams27

    Williams27 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,582
    3
    Nov 18, 2008
    I give him credit for the win but he is still limited.
     
  7. fatcity

    fatcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,931
    11
    Feb 26, 2005
    Props to Froch but he won't last long.He is exciting,though.:good
     
  8. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    I love the way people keep saying 'Taylor is the better fighter' as if being able to be conscious at the end of a fight is in no way relevant to being the 'better fighter'.
     
  9. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Froch TKO 12 Taylor

    That sums it up pretty well to me, with regard to who is the better fighter
     
  10. jcrh22

    jcrh22 Active Member Full Member

    1,149
    0
    Mar 4, 2006
    Taylor is the better boxer but he was also better than Pavlik. People don't seem to realise that Froch was the one that forced the pace that Taylor couldn't handle and made Taylor fight off the back foot which Taylor didn't want too.

    If Taylor is so much better he would of dictated the fight and fought it at his pace.
     
  11. Boxing in montr

    Boxing in montr Mandatory challenger Full Member

    2,456
    0
    May 21, 2008
    To me, Froch looks like Andrade, with a great chin, just a little more skills and little less pressure. Still, if Taylorhad better stamina, we wouldn't be talking about Carl Froch right now...
     
  12. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,719
    3,559
    Jul 10, 2005

    I think at the movement, even when Pavlik lost to Hopkins, I would rate Pavlik over Taylor. Being 2-0 against him is the main reason imo.

    I rate Froch over Taylor also. Just because he beat Taylor. No one was rateing Walcott over Marciano or Conn over Louis because these 2 had to win from behide.

    It does not matter how Froch won, he beat Taylor and thus should be rated over him.