"froch lost 11.5 rounds against taylor"

And some guy,"Suges" Ray Lennox or something lost nine rounds to Tommy Hearns,yet that's considered his greatest performance.
So if a club fighter like that gets props why should a genuine legend like Froch be slaughtered because he came from behind?

 

:deal Agreed. I think European fighters have become a force to reckon with and shouldn't be underestimated. Froch-Taylor reminds me abit of Curry-Honeyghan in some ways. Froch is a credit not only to British boxing, but boxing overrall. He's like an anti-hero type, but people like him. He could be getting his second wind in his career.

 

Basically just flew over everyone's heads, didn't it? :!:

 

Froch needed to win the last round by two point to win the fight.

In other words, he needed a KD.

When he got that.. he would have won.

He then proceeded to KTFO Taylor, but that was actually not necessary to win..

So yes.. complete myth that he was losing and only could iwn by KO.