I actually think the Robin Reid Calzaghe beat was a top class fighter and would have destroyed the Bute Froch beat. Bute was decent but was always vulnerable and is probably past it now. Reid beat the likes of Magee and was robbed against people like Ottke. Then you have a lot of guys like Mario Veit, Byron Mitchell, Charles Brewer etc. As well Johnson was good, exeptional at light heavy but old and below his best weight when he fought Froch. What's the point of twisting the truth for your argument? You must know yourself that your talking rubbish.
Froch has mouthed off about Calzaghe more than enough times, but when he was in the studio with Calzaghe he was trying to be up his arse and basically admitted Calzaghe would have won and Calzaghe was just himself and basically agreed.
Calzaghe notable wins... Delaney, Eubank, Reid, Sheika, Woodhall, Brewer, Mitchell, Lacy, Bika, Kessler, Hopkins, Jones Jr. That's 12 legit. Froch's notable wins... Pascal, Bute. That's 2. Taylor and Abraham were blown-up, shot middleweights, and Dirrell, Kessler and Ward all beat him. Glen Johnson was shot to pieces. (And Pascal wasn't very good. Bute completely unproven, deer in the head lights.)
Easiest way to go about this is to think we you can sit there all day and think about calzaghe and "what if", his career seems to be one big "what if". when froch retires there will be no such questions or doubts, thats not to say he is the better fighter, just more willing to test himself