Froch on beef with Khan

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by robpalmer135, Dec 9, 2009.


  1. NO MAS

    NO MAS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,784
    1
    Mar 2, 2009
    Very good point...:good
     
  2. Bomber_uk

    Bomber_uk Member Full Member

    402
    0
    Oct 18, 2007
    Froch has been asked questions and answered them honestly....... wtf do you poeple want ? Like he says many people commented on the Prescott debacle but hardly any of them were honest, a lot were just trying to gloss it over presumably to curry favour with Khan. I like the comment about if Froch was asian he would be on sky and a megastar in England etc, where are all the crying masses now eh ? Where are all the people who were claiming everyone is racist if you don't like khan now, presuambly froch is just an ignorant racist eh ?

    No he isn't he is just keeping it real and telling it how he sees it and I for one agree with him. He has done it just as hard ( if not harder ) as khan and deserves it just as much as khan but gets nowhere near the special treatment khan gets maybe that is another reason people don't like khan ( not saying it is his fault but you could see why froch may hold it against hinm can't you ) apart from the colour of his skin:nut
     
  3. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    I have the feeling that there is a brutal and embarassing defeat awaiting Froch, in the not to distant future.

    Also, if he's such a truth teller, "telling it how it is" and all that, how come he can't just admit that he got a gift against Dirrell, instead of the cheap excuses he peddled post-fight? :think
     
  4. Bomber_uk

    Bomber_uk Member Full Member

    402
    0
    Oct 18, 2007

    That is your interpretation Jim, I prefer to believe what froch has said and that basically he has told it how it is and khan doesn't like it end of, no more no less
     
  5. ScouseLad

    ScouseLad Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,080
    0
    Jul 14, 2007
    Well plenty on here think he won so why wouldnt he?!

    I actually gave it to Dirrell but loads chose Froch.
     
  6. Pug1list

    Pug1list Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,488
    4
    Dec 5, 2008
    No, he would be more popular if he wasn't a one trick pony, looked silly against Dirrell, and if he have had met Calzaghe, the term would be Froch'd not Lacy'd.
     
  7. Bomber_uk

    Bomber_uk Member Full Member

    402
    0
    Oct 18, 2007
    He said Dirrell ran and made it very difficult to fight his normal fight, fckn bang on from what I saw mate :good

    As for embarresing defeat, I reckon you could be right mate he does look like he will come up short at the highest level, so what ? It will be better to fight them and find out than dodge and fight cans and retire never knowing though surely :think
     
  8. Bomber_uk

    Bomber_uk Member Full Member

    402
    0
    Oct 18, 2007
    A one trick pony like Hatton you mean, a man with ridiculous support on these shores ?

    I don't disagree with the fact he is limited but so what ? He is ready to fight anyone put in front of him so more power to him for me.
     
  9. Pug1list

    Pug1list Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,488
    4
    Dec 5, 2008
    Hatton is endearing, and far more talented than Froch, also doesn't talk **** about everybody.
     
  10. Bomber_uk

    Bomber_uk Member Full Member

    402
    0
    Oct 18, 2007
    Hatton doesn't talk **** :think

    Listen mate they all talk ****, hatton, khan and froch. You are obviously a hater and I don't want to whip you into anymore of a frenzy about froch than you already are so I shall leave it there :good
     
  11. Pug1list

    Pug1list Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,488
    4
    Dec 5, 2008
    Nah, I like Froch actually, but he doesn't half talk ****.
     
  12. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    I really like Khan and I really like Froch too. I wish these (Khan in particular) would both just give it a rest now.

    Froch said absolutely nothing wrong in the first place and this interview makes me think even higher of the lad. A brilliant interview here and he shows what a class lad he is. Khan is still a top lad but he should stop whinging about Froch now. Froch wasn't the only person to have doubts about Khan's career getting back on track after he was KO'd in 53 secs and he definately wasn't the only person to have believed Khan/Kotelnik was boring.

    Khan has got everything on a plate for him now so he should just be concentrating on working towards his future. He hasn't beaten anyone of great note in all honesty Kotelnik was a decent fighter who happened to have a belt. Salita was No.1 contender but you have to wonder how after his performance on Saturday. Khan has the tools to beat the guys at or around 140 (whether he will or not we will see) so should just concentrate on that and not Froch.

    Froch has his work cut out big time in at least his next four fights which is a credit to him so he should just concentrate on that.

    Both are British and I will support them both as they should do each other considering they aren't domestic rivals
     
  13. SeasideSlugger

    SeasideSlugger Active Member Full Member

    649
    0
    Jan 8, 2008
    Agree, I think chunky Mick could be a hell of a lot better and I think Froch is missing a zero or 2 off his bank balance because of it.

    But also it's not a team sport, so if you see someone larging it on the back of ****-all, why not pick a few holes in it?
     
  14. Bomber_uk

    Bomber_uk Member Full Member

    402
    0
    Oct 18, 2007
    :good:good:good

    I think talking **** must just be a general trait with most, not all, but definately most boxers.
     
  15. Bomber_uk

    Bomber_uk Member Full Member

    402
    0
    Oct 18, 2007
    Bang on mate :good