Froch on Ringside

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by SS7, Mar 22, 2013.


  1. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    Sorry, meant HBO. What's to say HBO wouldn't have came knocking for the Kessler fight, if he didn't fight Manfredo? Of course they would.
     
  2. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    Would they? Two Euro fighters with little profile in the US?

    The Manfredo fight was clearly precursor to getting Calzaghe in a big fight on HBO.
     
  3. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    Little profile? Was you aware of Calzaghe schooling Lacy, who the broadcasters and Americans thought a lot of.

    I think they would have definitely gone for it, Kessler was the 1 contender fighting the champion in the division, both exciting and very good operators, fighting in front of 50,000 people with a crazy atmosphere, why would HBO not want it.
     
  4. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    IIRC the Manfredo fight was one requested by HBO to raise Joe's profile in the States against a name American opponent.
     
  5. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    When HBO broadcast it, it received one of their lowest World Championship Boxing ratings of that year. Lacy wasn't a star either, actually. He was a hyped title holder who had only featured on Showtime until that point.

    Showtime was starting to get good ratings and Lacy was one of its key signings. But he wasn't a crossover star. Outside of the hardcore, no one really knew who Joe or Mikkel was.

    That was why HBO wanted Manfredo. He was a bigger name than most at 168, just by virtue of being on a primetime US TV show.

    That's it.
     
  6. HOF

    HOF Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,873
    0
    Feb 10, 2008
    Absolutely. I didn't intend to pick any holes in Froch's recent fights as there's no way that anyone can because he has fought good fighter after good fighter. What I should've made clear is that I made that post within the context of a previous poster saying there was an obvious 'gulf in class' between the level of fighters Froch has faced and those that Calzaghe did. No such gulf exists, it's just that Froch has had to shoehorn successive fights against good fighters into the end of his career after his interminable 'rise' under Hennessy.

    Exactly. Froch said on Ringside that Degale and Groves both need a couple of 'tests' to propel them into the public consciousness as being deserving of a fight against him. Bearing in mind that Calzaghe retired in 2008 and had his last fight at 168 in Nov 2007, the link below makes rather hypocritical reading for Froch.

    http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?cat=boxer&human_id=97570

    I actually agree with Froch that a couple of step-up fights would do Groves and Degale good. But looking there at Froch's progress up to 2007 when Calzaghe had his last fight at 168, then Degale and Groves have a far a greater public profile right now than he did back then; when Froch had already been endlessly calling out Calzaghe for some time.
     
  7. DaveyboyEssexUK

    DaveyboyEssexUK Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,441
    2
    Jan 14, 2011
    it sure was and Taylor was clouted as the guy to fight Calzaghe after but he hid behind the $
     
  8. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    Fair points. :good
     
  9. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    I'm just bitter that they never fought, I mean Manfredo frigging Jr ffffffs, could have had Froch-Calzaghe, would have been too early for Carl at that point though, still think he'd have been competitive.
     
  10. Scotty321

    Scotty321 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,516
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    The Ring Mag rankings confirms this.
    http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/The_Ring_Magazine's_Annual_Ratings:_2006