Froch or Calzaghe? Who retired with the better resume?

I've mentioned that because you have such reputation. I didn't particularly accuse you of anything, it's just natural to question your credibility as your comments are mostly extreme towards certain boxers.

You did state the fact that Calzaghe only fought Kessler on home field and never faced Ward. That's fine and there's nothing wrong with that.

Your opinion on Calzaghe's quality as the SMW king might differ from the opinion of someone else, but the fact still stands - Calzaghe was the SMW king and Froch was not.

No matter how much you may dislike Calzaghe's reign, it's just your personal opinion and can never change that Calzaghe had the longest reign in the division history and retired undefeated.

Froch is/was hugely popular in the UK, but he has never come close to achieve what Calzaghe has achieved.

 

Froch might have the better resume (debatable) but Calslappy is the far superior fighter and thats all that matters

 

Calzaghe was also past his prime, and he had shot hands. He retired while Jones and Hopkins kept on.

 

I suppose but I can't see Froch beating Calslappy