Froch or khan? Who is the better of the two

nowt to pick between the two both british superstars who are destined for the hall of fame....:yep

 

Froch is the new hate figure for the ******ed yank ethnic peanut gallery in this forum. I guess they need an outlet for all their fighters looking like **** in the super 6.

 

Khan is a much better boxer, despite his obvious flaw(s).

Froch is a crude, one dimensional slugger with a big heart, decent chin and not a lot of talent.

 

Having asserted that Froch couldn't claim to have had a 'decent amateur pedigree', you backtracked ever so slightly to concede 'that his amateur career is pretty average for a world champion'.
It's clear your allowing your personal dislike of the man to cloud your judgement; if two ABA titles and a bronze at the world championships in 2001 is 'average' then how would you assess the amatuer careers of the numerous boxers who have captured world titles in the paid ranks who failed to medal at major world championships as amateurs?
And as for your repeated assertion that his fight with Pascal 'could have gone either way', you're in a minority of one, (sorry, three). See the thread below, where many Pascal supporters accept that Froch was the deserved victor). http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=109237&highlight=froch+pascal

 

most people would tell you Dirrell won...

 

Khan IMO

 

Froch !!

but Khan has potential ... Froch is fighting bigger guys, more skilled guys, and faces more of a risk than Khan ... and Froch has yet to be knocked out

 

What was Froch doing when he was 17?

What was Froch doing when he was 22?



What was Khan doing when he was 17? Winning a Silver Medal at Olympics


What was Khan doing when he was 22? Got KTFO, then 3 fights later moved up in weight to win a World Title.


Mother****ers need to show some respect, To many losers hate on Khan.

I had respect for Froch before he started mouthing off Khan, i mean Khan gets hate from everyone he is not even the same age or weight as Froch. Thats why I want Khan to be the best to prove all you haters wrong.

 

Khan is a joke ... will never be the fighter he's hyped up to be ...

 

With signs of his chin improving at 140 higher weight ,and him only 22 lets wait and see only time will tell.

 

Khans best asset is his promoter,he's well promoted and well protected.He may have sound basics,but against a genuine world champion he'd be found wanting.He's been far more disciplined since Roach came on the scene,but as sure as night follows day when he gets tagged he'll forget everything he's been told.

 

stop it your killing me. that caused a lolocaust.

 

His chin is his chin ... it has nothing to do with weight or age ... despite his chin being suspect he should've still got by the one dimensional Prescott. All good/great fighters go through those scenarios at some point in time.

 

Khan is better than Froch, but he's definitely a bigger arsehole. At least Froch takes big challenges on and doesn't stab the fans in the back by going to Sky as soon as he can.

 

khan is 22. Froch turned pro when he was like 25 didnt he?

Anyway i prefer neither tbh. I kinda like both but thats about it.